<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Research Institute of Hawzah and University;
(Hawzah wa Dāneshgāh Research Institute)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1608-7070</Issn>
				<Volume>15</Volume>
				<Issue>58</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>16</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A Method for Calculating Coding Reliability in Qualitative Research Interviews</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>A Method for Calculating Coding Reliability in Qualitative Research Interviews</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>161</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>174</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">418</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hamzah </FirstName>
					<LastName>Khastar</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>04</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The reliability of a scientific research is one of the most important indices of its validity. The high reliability of a research (often more than 60 percent) means that when a research is applied in different times or by different persons, the same conclusion will be reached. Although coding the interview data is one of the most important processes of organizational studies and public opinion assessment, the studies about calculating the reliability of coding are not enough. This paper concentrates on the reliability of coding in research interviews and offers a method for calculating this index. With this method researchers can calculate Re-test reliability (consistency index) and Intercoder reliability (2) in research interviews.
 </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The reliability of a scientific research is one of the most important indices of its validity. The high reliability of a research (often more than 60 percent) means that when a research is applied in different times or by different persons, the same conclusion will be reached. Although coding the interview data is one of the most important processes of organizational studies and public opinion assessment, the studies about calculating the reliability of coding are not enough. This paper concentrates on the reliability of coding in research interviews and offers a method for calculating this index. With this method researchers can calculate Re-test reliability (consistency index) and Intercoder reliability (2) in research interviews.
 </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Key words: interview</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">reliability index</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Re-test reliability</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">intercoder reliability (ICR)</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_418_e5a0c366f855eb221db4ee19e3fbb644.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
