پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاهروش شناسی علوم انسانی1608-7070416-1719981222-The Meaningful and the Meaningless in Religious Scienceمعنا و بى معنایى در «علم دینى»1221691FAخسرو باقریاستاد دانشگاه تهرانJournal Article19981007- <br />The papar starts with a definition of the term 'Science' by which it is meant the empirical science. Then, the question is formulated whether the notion of the religious science is meaningful or meaningless. <br />Epistemologically spkeaking, three standpoints are considered, that is,unitarianism, cotradictory pluralism, interactional pluralism. After defining them, with the views of the right scholars explicated, the writer concludes that from the perspectives of epistemological unitarianism and contradicitory pluralism, the notion of religious science would turn out to be meaningless. However, based on the interactional pluralism, the religious science becomes a meaningful term. Finally, the writer concludes that meaningfulness of the science merely paves the ground for its existence, and the creation of such a science yet remains another question.-https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_691_fbf98be59083d2940c2b4ad6ab2cdcf5.pdfپژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاهروش شناسی علوم انسانی1608-7070416-1719981222The Structure of Science and Religious Scienceساختار علم (درآمدى بر علم دینى)2345692FAحسین بستانعضو پژوهشکده حوزه و دانشگاهJournal Article19981007ScienceThe article intends to study the common denominators and intersection of the empirical sciences with and religion so as to study the instances in which religion may effect scinces. The aim is to provide foundations for the establishment of religious science. <br />For this purpoes,with the help of literature produced in the philosophy of science ,such subjects as the mode of scientific cognizance (description, explanation, and anticipation) and its characteristics (objectivity and the empirical methodes) were concidered, hense the degree of the effects of religion on the aims and scope of science. <br />as well as religious explanation and method were explicated. The conclusions that if religious science is empirical_oriented,it would have a lot to talk about the empirical religious explanations. Otherwise, other non_religious methods can play a major role in it.-https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_692_26f0eacfdfb54b0aa4c1ad435b083faf.pdfپژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاهروش شناسی علوم انسانی1608-7070416-1719981222Ojectivity and Religious Knowledgeعینیت علمى و نگرش دینى4669693FAعسگر دیربازعضوپژوهشگاه حوزه ودانشگاهJournal Article19981106In this paper,ojectivity_with its various and as a feature of scientific knowledge_is studied,with its relation to subjectivity. The role of evidence in satisfying the criteria of objectivity and thier impression from general concepts and presuppositions are also evluated. In the end,the factual objectivity is accepted with the respect to sciences. Also mentioned is the impression of scientific knowledge from the scientific method and religious knowledge. It is argued that the use of religious propositions in science does not violate objectivity in science; rather,it posits the possibility of having religious knowledge,as portrayed by the author.-https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_693_920e68594029ed9564fafa7900432822.pdfپژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاهروش شناسی علوم انسانی1608-7070416-1719981222Religious Knowledgeعلم دینى7087694FAمحمد فتحعلی خانیعضو پژوهشکده حوزه و دانشگاهJournal Article19981007The paper first addresses the confilict between religion and science, together with some solutions proposed. It then proposes religious knowledge as an epistimological field which obey the laws of empirical sciences.
The solution put forward addresses a deep_rooted confilict,as it is in reference to one concerning scientific and religious propositions. Moreover, it does not ignore the confilict between science and technology on one hand, and the crystalization of the aims of religions on the other hand.
In fact the proposed ways all faces difficulties; these include the distinction of thier scope, the difference in objectives and languages, the negation of the realization and negation of the factuality of the language of science. In this paper, it is expressed that for the religious knowledge to have a logically acceptable impression, and to the other deficiencies. It demandes to have a special stance in such matters as the language of religion,provability and refutability of scientific and religious staements, the place of convictions in matters of religion and science, and the role of unscientific matters in the body of science and religion.
Though religious knowledge renders simple and multifacet pictures,if it wishes to find a place in the sphere of scientific and to follow the laws of empirical sciences,it must find a place in the current accademic traditions.
The realization of this depends on the scientists' awareness of the secret factors which contribute to the development of science. On the other hand,it is also dependent on their awareness of basic outlooks on the universe,man,and the ends of life. Hence, one can not expect of religious knowledge to stand only on human religious beliefs but not on the current scientific tradition. Hence,religious knowledge is feasible in the hope of which profound reconsideration in the current scientific tradition can be followed by much more profound insight. This can not be expected to appear via a series of logical operations exnihilio.-https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_694_5e1b3d12ebf78e9fc93566fa20ddce47.pdfپژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاهروش شناسی علوم انسانی1608-7070416-1719981222-زبان دین و زبان علم8895695FAصادق لاریجانیاستاد حوزه علمیه قمJournal Article19981007--https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_695_1f758d662de7bf604d575a2662bb95b1.pdfپژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاهروش شناسی علوم انسانی1608-7070416-1719981222-The Sociological Theology and Religious Sociologyالهیات، جامعه شناسى و جامعه شناسى دینى96114696FAحسین کچوییانعضو هیأت علمى دانشکده علوم اجتماعى دانشگاه تهرانJournal Article19981007First, it is argued that the rule of patterns, the natural consequences of matterialization of science,and the deliberate deviation of the western social sciences from theology are singled out as the factors which have led to the total ignorance of such subject as theology and sociology. Similar cases happen in philosophy and science. Due to the prevailing cultural atmospher in the west, such an event is natural. According to the author of the article, there were some historical debates over the theology_science relationship; they were not given the due series of attention, however. There are two other relations as follows:
First, after M.Weber, the sociology of religion, and, in this field, the sociology of theology,were ignored, the same as what happen to the case of theology and sociology. It is less persued in its Weberian method. There is also, theoretically speaking, no barrier for its induction as a field of study in the realm of the sociology of realigion.
Second, the constructive relation of religion and science is such a background in which theology and sociology dovetail together so as to cooperate with each other to lay their foundations. According to the writer, in the sociology of religion, all the efferts done according to the former view led to a better understanding of religion, though with reduction and negetive tendency. On the other hand, in the second approach, the originality and reality of religion is taken to be certain, it is active in moulding and formulating the social thoughts and changes it .This effect is called the sociology of religion.
He also mentions the views held by Bawm,Flanagan,Gill,Lyon,and Milbank in the sociology of religion.-https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_696_b66a867ab019efc3fea70781f60cc4be.pdfپژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاهروش شناسی علوم انسانی1608-7070416-1719990110-جایگاه مفهومى «ایمان» در روانشناسى اجتماعى115129697FAمحمد کاویانیعضو پژوهشکده حوزه و دانشگاهJournal Article19981106--https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_697_c111c357488968e1cd5bc731ff36008f.pdfپژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاهروش شناسی علوم انسانی1608-7070416-1719981222.فلسفه دین: برگزیده اى از دیدگاه هاى معاصر130141849FAملویل واى استوارتمهدی ذاکریJournal Article19981020https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_849_584a1f28bf67bd854b9fae34b9a318eb.pdf