Research Institute of Hawzah and University;
(Hawzah wa Dāneshgāh Research Institute)Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities1608-7070249720190220Critical Communicative Methodology (CCM); A Way to Breaking the Hierarchical System of KnowledgeCritical Communicative Methodology (CCM); A Way to Breaking the Hierarchical System of Knowledge113153510.30471/mssh.2019.1535FANader SanatiPayame Noor University of MashhadJournal Article20180711Today, social researches are conducted utilizing quantitative or qualitative methods stem from different philosophical paradigms and have serious differences. In spite of the serious controversies between fans of quantitative and qualitative methods, these methods have some common points such as the hierarchy of knowledge. Both of them believe that the recognition of the social world, which is the goal of the humanities, is the scientific authority of the researchers. In contrast, Critical Communicative Methodology (CCM) contrasts the hierarchical system of knowledge and tries to link the social research with individual and social comprehension holding a critical approach. To reach this aim, in studies which are done using CCM, participants involve in a serious communication with researcher and findings are evaluated by an advisory committee. Furthermore, researchers who utilize CCM in their studies employ specific techniques for gathering and processing data which are discussed in this articleToday, social researches are conducted utilizing quantitative or qualitative methods stem from different philosophical paradigms and have serious differences. In spite of the serious controversies between fans of quantitative and qualitative methods, these methods have some common points such as the hierarchy of knowledge. Both of them believe that the recognition of the social world, which is the goal of the humanities, is the scientific authority of the researchers. In contrast, Critical Communicative Methodology (CCM) contrasts the hierarchical system of knowledge and tries to link the social research with individual and social comprehension holding a critical approach. To reach this aim, in studies which are done using CCM, participants involve in a serious communication with researcher and findings are evaluated by an advisory committee. Furthermore, researchers who utilize CCM in their studies employ specific techniques for gathering and processing data which are discussed in this articlehttps://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_1535_7e48ffde23381f11e74cdc0d46f4b8c8.pdfResearch Institute of Hawzah and University;
(Hawzah wa Dāneshgāh Research Institute)Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities1608-7070249720190220The Relation of Post Experiential approaches in Economics with Practical Wisdom of Islamic EconomicsThe Relation of Post Experiential approaches in Economics with Practical Wisdom of Islamic Economics1537153710.30471/mssh.2019.1537FAMohammadali FarahanifardResearcher of Higher School of Jurisprudence and Islamic Sciences0009-0006-3599-5724Journal Article20180515Post empirical epistemology was formed in Economics afterward paid attention to the role of the common sense in scientific knowledge. This epistemology has different branches in Economics, including interpretive, critical, and postmodernist one. <br /> This article argues that relation of Islamic Economics with these paradigms can be understood by using Islamic philosophers' principles and then Islamic Economics should be based on these principles as a practical wisdom. Accordingly, studding an economic action should be based on supportive perceptions of it and the practical wisdom of Islamic Economics uses appropriate source for studding each layer of economic action and thus has different interpretive, critical, explanatory and prescriptive dimensions. Nevertheless, it has differences from each of the above approaches. In the practical wisdom of Islamic Economics interpretation is not based on empirical sciences, criticism is not based on common sense, prescribing is based on holy wisdom, and explanation is based on rational intellectPost empirical epistemology was formed in Economics afterward paid attention to the role of the common sense in scientific knowledge. This epistemology has different branches in Economics, including interpretive, critical, and postmodernist one. <br /> This article argues that relation of Islamic Economics with these paradigms can be understood by using Islamic philosophers' principles and then Islamic Economics should be based on these principles as a practical wisdom. Accordingly, studding an economic action should be based on supportive perceptions of it and the practical wisdom of Islamic Economics uses appropriate source for studding each layer of economic action and thus has different interpretive, critical, explanatory and prescriptive dimensions. Nevertheless, it has differences from each of the above approaches. In the practical wisdom of Islamic Economics interpretation is not based on empirical sciences, criticism is not based on common sense, prescribing is based on holy wisdom, and explanation is based on rational intellecthttps://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_1537_07fcb6887b3257872ba7e1e47f9fb324.pdfResearch Institute of Hawzah and University;
(Hawzah wa Dāneshgāh Research Institute)Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities1608-7070249720190220Reconstruction of Karl Marx’s MethodologyReconstruction of Karl Marx’s Methodology3955154010.30471/mssh.2018.1540FAMonireh BahreiniMasters student; Amirkabir University of TechnologySaeid ZibakalamUniversity of TehranJournal Article20180802The methodology of Karl Marx, one of the most influential social scientists, has been reconstructed here according to the importance of methodology in the philosophy of science. Today, Marxist method is also widely used by researchers of social phenomena, while a few of them are aware of this. Marx's method in the study of phenomena begins with complicated objective facts and proceeds to the more basic concepts in a downward spiral. Then, the path goes in the opposite direction and ascends from simple categories to composite concepts. This cycle takes place on both paths and at all levels of abstraction dialectically. There are two basic elements in Marx's methodology. One, the production condition in each society and the other, the role of categories in the bourgeois society. Marx's works have been reviewed carefully and methodological points from them have been extracted in order to understand his methodology. Putting Marx's theory under the title of a definite theory that is common in the social sciences is impossible. Here we try to give a systematic categorization of Marx's theories on methodologyThe methodology of Karl Marx, one of the most influential social scientists, has been reconstructed here according to the importance of methodology in the philosophy of science. Today, Marxist method is also widely used by researchers of social phenomena, while a few of them are aware of this. Marx's method in the study of phenomena begins with complicated objective facts and proceeds to the more basic concepts in a downward spiral. Then, the path goes in the opposite direction and ascends from simple categories to composite concepts. This cycle takes place on both paths and at all levels of abstraction dialectically. There are two basic elements in Marx's methodology. One, the production condition in each society and the other, the role of categories in the bourgeois society. Marx's works have been reviewed carefully and methodological points from them have been extracted in order to understand his methodology. Putting Marx's theory under the title of a definite theory that is common in the social sciences is impossible. Here we try to give a systematic categorization of Marx's theories on methodologyhttps://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_1540_242e4a48c0066f694094bbbcb50af8d7.pdfResearch Institute of Hawzah and University;
(Hawzah wa Dāneshgāh Research Institute)Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities1608-7070249720190220Practical Wisdom as Philosophy of Human/Social SciencesPractical Wisdom as Philosophy of Human/Social Sciences5773154110.30471/mssh.2018.1541FASeyyed Hamid Reza HassaniResearch Institute of Hawzah and University0000-0002-1584-958XHadi MousaviResearch Institute of Hawzah and UniversityJournal Article20180708Does every paradigms of human/social sciences base on a theory of practical wisdom? Historical analysis of the presence of practical wisdom in philosophical and human/social thought, shows us that everything we call human/social sciences, are theories in the field of practical wisdom. The outcome of different philosophical approaches in the history and in different geographical situations, is a special kind of human/social sciences. This reveals us that different systems of thought can produce different educational and strategic systems. With a glimpse to the works of Aristotle, Nasir al-Din al-Tusi, Auguste Comte, Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx, Max Weber and Hans-Georg Gadamer we show that how they proceed a theory in practical wisdom as it is equal to human/social sciences. Metaphysical foundation of this theory is the division of existence into creatures who are independent of human will and dependent onesDoes every paradigms of human/social sciences base on a theory of practical wisdom? Historical analysis of the presence of practical wisdom in philosophical and human/social thought, shows us that everything we call human/social sciences, are theories in the field of practical wisdom. The outcome of different philosophical approaches in the history and in different geographical situations, is a special kind of human/social sciences. This reveals us that different systems of thought can produce different educational and strategic systems. With a glimpse to the works of Aristotle, Nasir al-Din al-Tusi, Auguste Comte, Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx, Max Weber and Hans-Georg Gadamer we show that how they proceed a theory in practical wisdom as it is equal to human/social sciences. Metaphysical foundation of this theory is the division of existence into creatures who are independent of human will and dependent oneshttps://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_1541_95ac70f13fccbb7d5747f50c256edbf4.pdfResearch Institute of Hawzah and University;
(Hawzah wa Dāneshgāh Research Institute)Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities1608-7070249720190220The Application of Qualitative Content Analysis in Extracting Social Analyses of Quran:
An Analytical Report on the Method of a StudyThe Application of Qualitative Content Analysis in Extracting Social Analyses of Quran:
An Analytical Report on the Method of a Study7599154210.30471/mssh.2018.1542FAAli SalimiResearch Institute of Hawzeh and UniversityJournal Article20180802The investigation of the role which Islamic teachings can play in offering concepts, propositions and theoretical models in the realm of social sciences, as well as valid methods for achieving these elements are considered as two striking points, however, neglected in the extensive controversies concerning the status of Islamic doctrine in social sciences. The present paper, seeking to recognize the capacity (the combined strategy of) qualitative content analysis has brought for extracting social analyses of Quran and providing interdisciplinary validity of these analyses has tried to outline and present the components, processes and conditions for the implementation of the pre-mentioned method (and strategy) and the criteria for its validity, authenticity and reliability along with the measures and proceedings which have been adopted in the path to utilizing it in the studying and analysis of Quran's social approaches and making sense and validation of this type of analysis in Islamic sciences. Thus, this research paper besides proposing this method (and strategy) in a practical form, as an interdisciplinary and text-based research in Islamic and social sciences, brings forward a type of executive instruction for the researches which are designed, generated and manipulated in this field, specifically for the inferences of social perspectives of sacred texts of IslamThe investigation of the role which Islamic teachings can play in offering concepts, propositions and theoretical models in the realm of social sciences, as well as valid methods for achieving these elements are considered as two striking points, however, neglected in the extensive controversies concerning the status of Islamic doctrine in social sciences. The present paper, seeking to recognize the capacity (the combined strategy of) qualitative content analysis has brought for extracting social analyses of Quran and providing interdisciplinary validity of these analyses has tried to outline and present the components, processes and conditions for the implementation of the pre-mentioned method (and strategy) and the criteria for its validity, authenticity and reliability along with the measures and proceedings which have been adopted in the path to utilizing it in the studying and analysis of Quran's social approaches and making sense and validation of this type of analysis in Islamic sciences. Thus, this research paper besides proposing this method (and strategy) in a practical form, as an interdisciplinary and text-based research in Islamic and social sciences, brings forward a type of executive instruction for the researches which are designed, generated and manipulated in this field, specifically for the inferences of social perspectives of sacred texts of Islamhttps://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_1542_5f9773f59fe088141e29dc5837cfaf73.pdfResearch Institute of Hawzah and University;
(Hawzah wa Dāneshgāh Research Institute)Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities1608-7070249720190220The Formation of Language of Science in the Context of Natural LanguageThe Formation of Language of Science in the Context of Natural Language101115154310.30471/mssh.2018.1543FAMohammad Reza Vaez ShahrestaniResearcher of University of BonnMehdi NasrinThe Iranian Institute of Philosophy (IRIP)Journal Article20180901In this paper, first of all, a short introduction of entrance of language into philosophical and subsequently philosophy of science issues is presented. Then, it will be shown that the scientific activity is a collaborative activity which is based on interpretation and communication and so it provides Davidson’s conditions. In third part, the formation of the language of science, as a social activity which provides Davidson’s conditions, in the context of a natural language will be investigated. In this paper, first of all, a short introduction of entrance of language into philosophical and subsequently philosophy of science issues is presented. Then, it will be shown that the scientific activity is a collaborative activity which is based on interpretation and communication and so it provides Davidson’s conditions. In third part, the formation of the language of science, as a social activity which provides Davidson’s conditions, in the context of a natural language will be investigatedIn this paper, first of all, a short introduction of entrance of language into philosophical and subsequently philosophy of science issues is presented. Then, it will be shown that the scientific activity is a collaborative activity which is based on interpretation and communication and so it provides Davidson’s conditions. In third part, the formation of the language of science, as a social activity which provides Davidson’s conditions, in the context of a natural language will be investigated. In this paper, first of all, a short introduction of entrance of language into philosophical and subsequently philosophy of science issues is presented. Then, it will be shown that the scientific activity is a collaborative activity which is based on interpretation and communication and so it provides Davidson’s conditions. In third part, the formation of the language of science, as a social activity which provides Davidson’s conditions, in the context of a natural language will be investigatedhttps://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_1543_f59c14ee5d470dd066197bcd9e585d08.pdf