Hermeneutic Phenomenology In Qualitative Research

Document Type : علمی - پژوهشی

Authors

1 PhD, Associate Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University

2 PhD Candidate,, Faculty of Social Sciences , Allameh Tabataba'i University

Abstract

Various methodologies have been proposed for phenomenology as a qualitative research method. This diversity can be divided into two main approaches: descriptive phenomenology and hermeneutic phenomenology. In this article, while emphasizing the inseparable link between philosophy and method in phenomenology, an attempt is made to explore the philosophical foundations of hermeneutic phenomenology and to trace this link in the research process. Accordingly, we first refer to the historical contexts of the emergence of phenomenology, and clarify the relationship between hermeneutic phenomenology and descriptive phenomenology, then Through the discussion of the views of Heidegger and Gadamer, it is shown that philosophical foundations in the method of hermeneutic phenomenology play an active role throughout the research process and give structure and direction to how we deal with issues and problems in research. Openness to the phenomenon and being in constant dialogue with it, is the most important feature of this method that as a praxis, from the moment of choosing the subject and encountering the research literature and theories to collecting and analyzing data and writing the research, it is always present and guides in the research

Keywords

References

1. اسپیگلبرگ، هربرت (1391)، جنبش پدیدارشناسی درآمدی تاریخی، ترجمه مسعود علیا، تهران: مینوی خرد.
2. اشمیت، ریچارد (1375)، «سرآغاز پدیدارشناسی»، ترجمه شهرام پازوکی، فرهنگ، ش18، ص9−26.
3. اعرابی، سیدمحمد و حسن بودلایی (1390)، «استراتژی تحقیق پدیدارشناسی»، روش‎شناسی علوم انسانی، ش68، ص31−58.
4. بودلایی، حسن (1395)، روش تحقیق پدیدارشناسی، تهران: جامعه‎شناسان.
5. پروری، پیمان (1398)، «خوانشی نو از پدیدارشناسی؛ بنیان‎های فلسفی، رویکردها و چارچوب اجرای تحقیق پدیدارشناسی»، مطالعات جامعه‎شناسی، ش44، ص87−106.
6. جمادی، سیاوش (1385)، زمینه و زمانه پدیدارشناسی، تهران: نشر ققنوس.
7. ریس، ویلیام آل (1399)، فرهنگ فلسفه، ترجمه شاپور اعتماد و همکاران، تهران: مؤسسه پژوهشی حکمت و فلسفه ایران.
8. فلیک، اووه (1391)، درآمدی بر تحقیق کیفی، هادی جلیلی، تهران: نشر نی.
9. مجتهدی، کریم (1376)، هگل و فلسفه او، تهران: انتشارات امیرکبیر.
10. محمدپور، احمد (1389)، ضد روش: منطق و طرح در روش‎شناسی کیفی، تهران: جامعه‎شناسان.‎
11. مریام، شرون، بی (1394)، تحقیق کیفی (راهنمایی برای طراحی و اجرا)، ترجمه نورالله پاشا، چ1، تهران: جامعه‎ معاصر.
12. کرسول، جان (1396)،پویش کیفی و طرح پژوهش، ویرایش دوم، چ3، ترجمه حسن دانایی‎فرد و حسین کاظمی، تهران: صفّار.
13. نقیب‎زاده، احمد و حبیب‎الله فاضلی (1385)، «درآمدی بر پدیدارشناسی به مثابه روش علمی»، پژوهش‌نامۀ علوم سیاسی، س1، ش2، ص29−54.
14. هایدگر، مارتین (1398)، مسائل اساسی پدیدارشناسی، ترجمه پرویز ضیاءشهابی، تهران: مینوی خرد.
15. هوسرل، ادموند (1398)، تأملات دکارتی، ترجمه عبدالکریم رشیدیان، چ8، تهران: نشر نی.
16. Adams, C. & van Manen, M. (2008), Phenomenology, In Given, L. M.(Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Two Volume Set, Sage Publications.
17. Dahlberg, K. (2006). The essence of essences: The search for meaning structures in phenomenological analysis of lifeworld phenomena. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 1 (1): 11–19.
18. Finlay, L. (2008), A dance between the reduction and reflexivity: Explicating the phenomenological psychological attitude, Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 39 (1), 1–32.
19. Finlay, L. (2012), Debating Phenomenological Methods, In N. Friesen, C. Henriksson & T. Saevi (Eds.), Hermeneutic Phenomenology in Education, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
20. Gadamer, H–G. (1976), Philosophical hermeneutics (D.E. Linge, Trans), Berkely, CA: University of California Press.
21. Gadamer, H–G. (2004), Truth and Method (Weinsheimer, J & Marshall, D. Trans), New York, NY: Continuum.
22. Gadamer, H–G. (2007), The Gadamer Reader: A bouquet of the later writings (R. E. Palmer, ED), Evanson, IL: Northwestern University Press.
23. Giorgi, A. (2007), Concerning the Phenomenological Methods of Husserl and Heidegger and their Application in Psychology, Collection du Cirp, 1(1). P.63–78.
24. Giorgi, A. (2009), The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach, Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
25. Heidegger, M. (1999), Ontology – The hermeneutics of facticity. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
26. Held, K. (2003), The New Husserl – A Critical Reader. Welton, Donn (Ed), Indiana University Press.
27. Higgs, J., Horsfall, D., Grace, S. (2009). Writing Qualitative Research on Practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
28. Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E.G. (1985), Naturalistic Inquiry. London: SAGE Publication.
29. Lopez, K. A. & Willis, D. G. (2004), Descriptive Versus Interpretive Phenomenology: Their Contributions to Nursing Knowledge. Qualitative Health Research, 14 (5), 726–735.
30. Loftus, S. & Trede, F. (2009). Hermeneutic Writing. In J. Higgs, D. Horsfall & S. Grace (Eds.) Writing Qualitative Research on Practice. Rottersam: Sense Publishers.
31. Moran, D. (2000), Introduction to Phenomenology, London: Routledge.
32. Moules, N., McCaffrey, G., Field, J, C., Laing, C, M. (2015), Conducting Hermeneutics Research: From Philosophy to Practice, New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
33. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research methods. London: Sage Publications.
34. Parse, R.R. (1990), Health: A Personal Commitment in Nursing Science Quarterly 136–140.
35. Peoples, K. (2020), How to Write a Phenomenological Dissertation, London: SAGE Publications.
36. Smith, J. A, Flowers, P. & Larkin, M. (2009), Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC.
37. Vagle, M. (2018), Crafting Phenomenological Research, New York: Routledge.
38. Vanderstoep, S .W & Johnston, D. D. (2009), Research Methods for everyday Life: Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. San Francisco: Jossey–bass.
39. Van Manen, M. (2001), Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy, State University of New York Press.
40. Van Manen, M. (2014), Phenomenology of Practice, London: Routledge.
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics