Bourdieu and Analyzing Social Issues in Educational Research

Document Type : علمی - پژوهشی

Author

Tehran university

Abstract

Educational research is an interdisciplinary research. Therefore, for the purpose of accurately explaining and analyzing the educational issues, a researcher in this field needs to use social research methods and related theories. One of the research approaches in the social sciences is the result of Bourdieu's approach to the twentieth century sociologist who has had a significant impact on social theory and sociology and has created methodological developments in various social areas, including education. Purpose After presenting an introduction to Pierre Bourdri's theoretical work, the main article of this paper introduces the methods of educational research based on his approach. To do this, we rely on a wide range of Bourdieu's writings published individually or with colleagues, especially in relation to educational issues. Not only on the basis of his analysis of his work and his views on research on educational issues, but on the basis of the approaches of researchers with Bourdieu's view, we have analyzed the method of social research in educational issues based on his viewpoint. The result of the analytical-descriptive study of the relevant documentation has shown that the Bourdieu study is the beginning of experimental facts in the field of educational practice. Educational research is also based on the analysis of the distinction between successful and unsuccessful students from the perspective of the social base and is necessary during the The distinction between what is created in the interaction of education in terms of social differences is analyzed and the educational content is explained in terms of the cultural symbols of the criterion

Keywords

References

اکبری، امین (1383)، نقش سرمایه اجتماعی در مشارکت تأثیر سرمایه اجتماعی بر مشارکت سیاسی و اجتماعی، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه تهران.
سوارتز، دیوید (1381)، «برقراری ارتباط بین مطالعه فرهنگ و دین: اقتصاد سیاسی قدرت پیر بوردیو »، اقتصاد سیاسی، ترجمه شفیعه صالحی، س3، ش10، ص88-122.
روت، ﻣﺎﯾﮑﻞ ( 1389)، ﻓﻠﺴﻔﮥ ﻋﻠﻮم اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ، روﺷ‌‌ﻬﺎ، آرﻣﺎ‌ﻧﻬﺎ و ﺳﯿﺎﺳﺖ‌ﻫﺎی ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ، ﺗﺮﺟﻤﻪ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺷﺠﺎﻋﯿﺎن، ﺗﻬﺮان: ﭘﮋوﻫﺸﮑﺪه ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎت ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ و اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ.
Boehnert, J., (2016), Design as Symbolic Violence: Reproducing the ‘isms’,A Framework for Allies Intersectional Perspectives on Design, Politics and Power School of Arts and Communication, Malmö University, 14 and 15 November ,1-8.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L., (1993), “From ruling class to field of power”, Theory, Culture & Society, 10 (1), 19–44.
Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J.C., (1996), Rerproduction in education, society and cultural, Beverly hills, CA: sage.
Bourdieu, P., (2001), Masculine Domination, Cambridge: Polity Press.
_______ (2004), Sketch for Self-Analysis, Cambridge: Polity Press.
_______ (2008), Political Interventions: Social Science and Political Action, Cambridge, Polity Press.
_______ (1989), “Social Space and Symbolic Power”, Sociological Theory, Vol. 7, No. 1 ,pp. 14-25.
 Calarco, J., M., (2014), “Coached for the Classroom: Parents' Cultural Transmission and Children's Reproduction of Educational Inequalities”, American Sociological Review, 79(5):1015-1037·
Carter, P., (2003), “‘Black’ Cultural Capital, Status Positioning, and Schooling Conficts for Low-Income African American Youth”, Social Problems, Vol. 50, (1),136–155.
Dumais, S. A., (2002), “Cultural Capital, Gender, and School Success: The Role of Habitus”, Sociology of Education, 75 (1), 44-68.
Gast M., J.s .(2018), “They Give Teachers a Hard Time: Symbolic Violence and Intersections of Race and Class in Interpretations of Teacher-student”, Relations Sociological Perspectives, 61(2), 257–275.
Graaf., N.D., Graaf., P.M.D., and Kraaykamp, G., (2000), “Parental Cultural Capital and Educational Attainment in the Netherlands: A Refinement of the Cultural Capital Perspective”, Sociology of Education, 73 (2), 92-111.
Grenfell, M., (2008), Bourdieu: Key Concepts, Stocksfield: Acumen.
Harris, D.M., (2012), “Varying teacher expectations and standards”, Education and Urban Society, 44(2), 128-150.
Lareau A., & Horvat E., M., ( January 1999), “Moments of Social Inclusion and Exclusion”, Sociology of Education, 72 (1), 37-53.
Lewis, A. E., & Diamond, J. B., (2015), Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrives in good schools, New York: Oxford University Press.
Lingard, B., & Rawolle, S., (2009), “Understanding quality and equity of schooling in Scotland: locating educational traditions globally”, Education in the North: The Journal of Scottish education,  1 (17), 1-17.
Root, M., (2010), The Philosophy of Social Sciences: Methods, Ideas, and Social Research Policies, Translated by Mohammad Shojaeen, Tehran: Publications of the Institute for Social Cultural Studies )In Persian(.
Sullivan, A., (2001), “Cultural Capital and Educational Attainment”, Sociology, 35, Issue 4, 893-912.
Vogl, K., & Preckel, F., (2014), “Full-time ability grouping of gifted Students: Impacts on social self-concept and school-related attitudes”, Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(1), 51-68.
 Wacquant., l., (2013), “Symbolic power and group-making: On Pierre Bourdieu’s reframing of class”, Journal of Classical Sociology, Vol. 13, Issue 2, pp.274-291
Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities
Volume 24, Issue 96 - Serial Number 96
December 2018
Pages 105-117

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics