Research Methodology of Critical Realism: Theoretical Foundations, Process and Implementation

Document Type : علمی - پژوهشی

Authors

1 Tarbiat Modares University,Management and Accounting Faculty

2 Tarbiat Modares University, Management and Accounting faculty

3 Tarbiat Modares University, Management and Accounting Faculty

Abstract

Criticisms of the dominant paradigms of the science, especially the positivism and the interpretive paradigms, have intensified efforts to find alternative paradigms. One of the paradigms that has emerged in this regard is critical realism. This paradigm has created a reconciliation between the two rival paradigms by borrowing ontology from positivism and epistemology from interpretivism. Critical realism claims that can lead us to deeper understanding of the phenomena and it`s generative mechanisms by stratified ontology of it, that considers reality in three empirical, actual and real layers. But despite of the positive role of this paradigm in better understanding of the phenomena, methodology of it is still unclear and a few researches have been done in this paradigm. Therefore, in this article, after introducing the concepts, assumptions and theoretical foundations of critical realism, an attempt has been made to study its methodology from the perspective of different researchers. Finally, a practical example of research conducted under the banner of this paradigm is described to shed light on research in critical realism.

Keywords


  1. بلیکی. نورمن (1389)، استراتژی‌های پژوهش اجتماعی، قاسم آقا بیگ پوری، تهران: جامعه‌شناسان.
  2. پورکریمی، مجتبی؛ علی‌رضا صادق‌زاده قمصری؛ خسرو مهر باقری نوع‌پرست و محمود محمدی (1393)، «تبیین مفروضات هستی‌شناسی رئالیسم انتقادی باسکار و دلالت‌های آن بر پژوهش میان‌رشته‌ای»، مطالعات میان‌رشته‌ای در علوم انسانی، ش23، ص137−172.
  3. محمدپور، احمد؛ مهدی علیزاده و مهدی رضایی (1390)، «مقدمه‏ای بر بنیان‏های فلسفی و روش‏شناختی رئالیسم انتقادی»، اسلام و علوم اجتماعی، دوره 3، ش5، ص79−106.
  4. یزدانی، حمیدرضا (1399)، جزوه منتشر نشده درس فلسفه علم و روش‌شناسی در مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران.
    1. Ackroyd, S, Karlsson, JC (2014) Critical realism, research techniques, and research designs. In: Edwards, PK, O’Mahoney, J, Vincent, S (eds) Studying Organizations Using Critical Realism A Practical Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 21–45.
    2. Bhaskar, R. (1975) A Realist Theory of Science. Leeds, Leeds Books.
    3. Bhaskar, R. (1998), The Possibility of Naturalism, London: Routledge.
    4. Bottomore, T. B. (1984), The Frankfurt School, London: Routledge.
    5. Bunge, M. (2004), “How does it work? The search for explanatory mechanisms”, Philosophy of The Social Sciences34(2), 182-210.
    6. Bygstad, B., & Munkvold, B. E. (2011), “In search of mechanisms. Conducting a critical realist data analysis”, in: Proceedings of the thirty second international conference on information systems (ICIS), Shanghai, 1-15.
    7. Carlsson, S. A. (2003), “Advancing information systems evaluation (research): a critical realist approach”, Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation6(2), 11-20.
    8. Danermark, B. (2002), “Interdisciplinary research and critical realism the example of disability research”, Alethia5(1), 56-64.
    9. Danermark, B., Ekstrom, M., & Jakobsen, L. (2002), Explaining Society: An Introduction to Critical Realism in the Social Sciences, New York and London: Routledge.
    10. DeLanda, Manuel (2006), “Deleuzian Social Ontology and Assemblage Theory”, In Deleuze and the Social, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    11. Easton, G. (2010), “Critical realism in case study research”, Industrial Marketing Management39(1), 118-128.
    12. Fleetwood, S. (2005), “Ontology in organization and management studies: A critical realist perspective”, Organization, 12(2), 197-222.
    13. Fleetwood, S., & Ackroyd, S. (2004), Critical Realist Applications in Organization And Management Studies (Vol.11), Oxford: Psychology Press.
    14. Fletcher, A. J. (2016), “Applying critical realism in qualitative research: methodology meets method”, International Journal of Social Research Methodology20(2), pp. 181-194.
    15. Hu, X. (2018), “Methodological implications of critical realism for entrepreneurship research”, Journal of Critical Realism, 17)2(, 118-139.
    16. Kempster, S., & Parry, K. W. (2011), “Grounded theory and leadership research: A critical realist perspective”, The Leadership Quarterly22(1), 106-120.
    17. Lawson, T. (2003), Reorienting Economics, (Vol 20), London: Routledge.
    18. Miller, D. X, & Turnbull, W. (1990), “The counterfactual fallacy: Confusing what might have been with what ought to have been”, Social Justice Research, 4, 1-19. 
    19. Mingers, J. (2004), “Real-izing information systems: critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems”, Information and Organization, 14(2), 87-103.
    20. Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997), Realistic Evaluation, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    21. Pettigrew, Andrew (1985), Contextualist Research and the Study of Organizational Change Processes. In: Mumford, Enid, Hirschheim, Rudi, Fitzgerald, Guy and Wood-Harper, Trevor, (eds.) Research Methods in Information Systems. Elsevier Science, pp. 53-75.
    22. Sayer, R. A. (2000), Realism and Social Science, London: Sage.
    23. Sayer, R. A. (1992), Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. London: Routledge.
    24. Sellars, R. W. (1916), Critical Realism: A Study of the Nature and Conditions Of Knowledge. New York, Rand, McNally.
    25. Thapa, D., & Omland, H. O. (2018), “Four steps to identify mechanisms of ICT4D: A critical realism‐based methodology”, The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 84(6), e12054.
    26. Vincent, S. & O'Mahoney, J. (2016), Critical realism and qualitative research: an introductory overview. In: Grandy, G, Cassell, C. and Cunliffe, A. eds. SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods, London: Sage.
    27. Walsham, G. 2006. “Doing Interpretive Research.” European Journal of Information Systems 15 (3): 320-330.
    28. Wynn Jr, D., & Williams, C. K. (2012), “Principles for conducting critical realist case study research in information systems”, MIS Quarterly, 36 (3), 787-810.
    29. Yeung, H. W. C. (1997), “Critical realism and realist research in human geography: a method or a philosophy in search of a method? ”, Progress in Human Geography, 21(1), 51-74.