While it is supposed that scholarly articles that are published in
academic journals contain the newest data or findings in related fields,
in fact most of them, especially in humanities, lack this feature and
have nothing new to say. In fact, these articles in spite of following
the required rules, such as writing abstracts, keywords, and
hypotheses, are worthless, time-wasting, and we should not bother
ourselves by reading them. This article tries to analyze this kind of
articles and show what is wrong with them. After reading many of
these articles carefully, the writer's findings show that instead of
having specific aims or problems to solve, they are some sort of
collage-writing, deceiving, and non-scholarly articles in disguise.
., .. (2013). Fatness or Swelling; an analysis of (non)scholarly articles in
humanities. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 19(74-75), 91-118.
MLA
. .. "Fatness or Swelling; an analysis of (non)scholarly articles in
humanities". Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 19, 74-75, 2013, 91-118.
HARVARD
., .. (2013). 'Fatness or Swelling; an analysis of (non)scholarly articles in
humanities', Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 19(74-75), pp. 91-118.
VANCOUVER
., .. Fatness or Swelling; an analysis of (non)scholarly articles in
humanities. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2013; 19(74-75): 91-118.
)