What is the Human Sciences

Document Type : علمی - پژوهشی

Authors

1 Faculty Member of the Research Institute of Hawzah & University, Qom, Iran, hrhasani

2 Research Institute of Hawzah & University

Abstract

The so−called "Social Sciences" today inherit the Scottish and French philosophical tradition. Classical German philosophers referred to what their French counterparts understood as the social sciences, under the headings "Historical Science", "Geisteswissenschaften" or "Moral Sciences". All of this predates the so−called "Moral Philosophy". All of this shows the difference in perspective that these views have taken on the nature of human. From the point of view of Wilhelm Dilthey, the Human Sciences are Historical Sciences because he understood human as a historical being. On the other hand, others, because they considered human as a Voluntary creature, therefore, portrayed the field of Human Sciences as the realm of will and morality. Gadamer, therefore, consider Human Science to be the legacy of Aristotelian Phronesis. From the point of view of this article, although the focus on Aristotelian Practical Wisdom cannot bring much to Human Sciences, but another period of Practical Wisdom has been formed in the space of Muslim thinkers, which, in addition to preserving the name of Practical Wisdom, has changed its identity in general. That was the cornerstone of the law of human action in the knowledge of Practical Wisdom; A universal law that promoted practical wisdom from the study of the virtuous to the knowledge of recognizing the human world and the world of morality, and thus established itself as the great ancestor of the Human Sciences.

Keywords

References

 
 
1. دیلتای، ویلهلم (1388)، مقدمه بر علوم انسانی، ترجمه منوچهر صانعی‎دره‎بیدی، تهران: ققنوس.
2. عابدی شاهرودی، علی (1391)، نظریه ابن‌سینا درباره حکمت عملی، مندرج در کتاب: حکمت عملی شیخ الرئیس، به کوشش محسن جوادی، همدان: بنیاد علمی و فرهنگی بوعلی سینا.
3. _______ (1395)، قانون اخلاق بر پایه نقد عقل به عقل، قم: کتاب طه.
4. فروند، ژولین (1372)، آراء و نظریه‎ها در علوم انسانی، ترجمه علی‌محمد کاردان، تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
5. کورنر، اشتفان (1367)، فلسفه کانت، ترجمه عزت الله فولادوند، تهران: خوارزمی.
6. ملاصدرا (بی‎تا)، الحاشیة على الهیات الشفاء، قم: بیدار.
7. موسوی بجنوردی، کاظم (1384)، دائرةالمعارف بزرگ اسلامی، تهران: سازمان انتشارات وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی.
8. Aristotle (2009), (NE) The Nicomachean Ethics, Translated by: David Ross, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Austin M. M., Vindal−Naquet P., (1977), Economic and Social History of Ancint Greece, Translated by M. M Austin, London, Batsford Academic and Educational LTD.
10. Durkheim, Emile (1984), Division of Labor, London: MacMillan.
11. __________ (1993), Ethics and Sociology of Morals, Trans: Robert T. Hall, New York: Prometheus Book.
12. Gadamer, Hans. Georg (1989), Truth and Method, Revised Translation by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald. g. Marshall, New York: Seabury Press.
13. Hacking, Ian (2013), The Taming of Chance, Cambridge University Press, New York.
14. Hume, David (2007), Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, UK, Cambridge University Press.
15. Kant, Immanuel (1933), Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith, London: Macmillian.
16. Mueller−Vollmer, Kurt (1985), The Hermeneutics Reader, New York: The Continuum Publishing Company.
17. Smith, Adam (2003), The Wealth of Nations, Bantam Classics.
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics