Alvin Plantinga believes there are some kinds of conflicts between some deliverances of science and religious beliefs. To correct, on one hand, misinterpretations of the Scripture and, on the other hand, wrong scientific claims, he proposes, we must use in science all of what we know: what we find through experience, as well as what we know by way of faith. Methodological naturalism, one of methodological assumptions of scientific practice, prevents us to achieve this goal. According to methodological naturalism, scientists can’t use supernatural explanation, evidence and concept in science. In addition to rejecting methodological naturalism, Plantinga maintains many theories in humanities apply normative concepts and definitions; and religion can be used as a source for this concepts and definitions. Consequently, Plantinga’s idea, Augustinian Science, has been based on four principles: using hermeneutical finding along with empirical evidence in science; rejecting methodological naturalism; using normative concepts and definitions which comes from religious world view, in theories which need them; assuming properly basic beliefs of believers
Hasani, S. H., & Mudarrisī Yazdi, S. M. (2012). Methodology of Augustinian Science. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 17(69), 7-39.
MLA
Sayyid Hamīd-Rezā Hasani; Sayyid Muhammad-Taqīy Mudarrisī Yazdi. "Methodology of Augustinian Science". Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 17, 69, 2012, 7-39.
HARVARD
Hasani, S. H., Mudarrisī Yazdi, S. M. (2012). 'Methodology of Augustinian Science', Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 17(69), pp. 7-39.
VANCOUVER
Hasani, S. H., Mudarrisī Yazdi, S. M. Methodology of Augustinian Science. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2012; 17(69): 7-39.
)