Mission-Orientation and the Issue of Defining Research Missions: Bottom-Up and Top-Down

Document Type : علمی - پژوهشی

Author

National Research Institute for Science Policy (NRISP)

Abstract

In recent years, implementing mission-oriented innovation policies to address grand societal challenges has been pursued in various countries. As a result, there has been a substantial increase in theoretical discussions about the policies and related issues. One difficulty with mission-oriented innovation policies is their centralized character in challenge identification and mission definition. Identifying grand challenges and defining missions within a mission-oriented innovation policy are seen as centralized and top-down. There are several objections to the top-down approach to defining missions. Some researchers also argue that although traditional mission-oriented innovation policies embed a top-down approach in defining missions, it is not the case with modern mission-oriented policies that aim to address grand societal challenges and have diffusion-oriented and bottom-up aspects. However, the alternative bottom-up approach is also subject to several objections. In this paper, after considering the objections the top-down and/or bottom-up approaches encounter, a combined approach to challenge identification and mission definition is proposed based on the requirements a research mission should fulfill, which does not face the problems of the existing approaches.

Keywords

References

  1. Bours, Sanne Amjv M. J. V., Wanzenböck, Iris, & Frenken, Koen. (2022). Small wins for grand challenges. A bottom-up governance approach to regional innovation policy. European Planning Studies, 30 (11): 2245-2272. doi: org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1980502
  2. Bryan, Glenn L. (1972). Evaluation of basic research in the context of mission orientation. American Psychologist, 27 (10): 947-950. doi.org/10.1037/h0033451
  3. Campbell, T. L. (1967). Basic science in mission oriented endeavor. Science, 156 (3775): 670-672. doi.org/10.1126/science.156.3775.670
  4. Castelnovo, Paolo, & Florio, Massimo. (2020). Mission-oriented public organizations for knowledge creation. In L. Bernier, M. Florio & P. Bance (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of state-owned enterprises (1st ed., pp. 587-604). London: Routledge.
  5. Edquist, Charles, & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, Jon Mikel. (2012). Public procurement for innovation as mission-oriented innovation policy. Research Policy, 41 (10): 1757-1769. org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.022
  6. Ergas, Henry. (1987). Does technology policy matter?. In B. R. Guile & H. Brooks (Eds.), Technology and global industry: Companies and nations in the world economy (pp. 191-245). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  7. European Union, Council of the. (2008). Conclusions on the definition of a 2020 vision for the European research area. Brussels: European Council. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms-Data/docs/pressData/en/intm/104434.pdf (Retrieved June 7, 2023)
  8. Fisher, Robbert, et al. (2017). Mission-oriented research and innovation: Assessing the impact of a mission-oriented research and innovation approach: Final report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  9. Foray, Dominique, Mowery, David C., & Nelson, Richard R. (2012). Public R&D and social challenges: What lessons from mission R&D programs?. Research Policy, 41 (10): 1697-1702. org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.011
  10. Göransson, Bo, Chaminade, Cristina, & Bayuo, Blaise Booponoyeng. (2022). Transforming universities to address grand societal challenges: A case study of organisational and institutional change at Lund University. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 12 (1): 13-41. org/10.1504/IJIPM.2022.120990
  11. Hekkert, Marko (2023). Response to “missions and mission-oriented innovation policy for sustainability: A review and critical reflection”. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions: 100722. doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2023.100722
  12. Hekkert, Marko P., et al. (2020). Mission-oriented innovation systems. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34: 76-79. org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.011
  13. Imaz, Oier, & Eizagirre, Andoni. (2020).Responsible innovation for sustainable development goals in business: An agenda for cooperative firms. Sustainability, 12 (17): 6948. org/10.3390/su12176948
  14. Kattel, Rainer, & Mazzucato, Mariana. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policy and dynamic capabilities in the public sector. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27 (5): 787-801. org/10.1093/icc/dty032
  15. Kirchherr, Julian, Hartley, Kris, & Tukker, Arnold. (2023). Missions and mission-oriented innovation policy for sustainability: A review and critical reflection. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 47: 100721. org/10.1016/j.eist.2023.100721
  16. Kitcher, Philip. (2001). Science, truth, and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  17. Kitcher, Philip. (2007). Scientific research–who should govern?. NanoEthics, 1: 177-184. org/10.1007/s11569-007-0019-2
  18. Koontz, Tomas M., & Newig, Jens. (2014). From planning to implementation: Top-down and bottom-up approaches for collaborative watershed management. Policy Studies Journal, 42 (3): 416-442. org/10.1111/psj.12067
  19. Larrue, Philippe. (2021). The design and implementation of mission-oriented innovation policies: A new systemic policy approach to address societal challenges. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers (100). org/10.1787/3f6c76a4-en
  20. Lentsch, Justus, & Weingart, Peter. (2011). Introduction: The quest for quality as a challenge to scientific policy advice: An overdue debate. In J. Lentsch & P. Weingart (Eds.), The politics of scientific advice: Institutional design for quality assurance (pp. 3-18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Lindner, Ralf, et al. (2021). Mission-oriented innovation policy: From ambition to successful implementation. Perspectives - Policy Brief (Vol. 02/2021). Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung ISI. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/247782 (Retrieved August 10, 2022)
  22. Mazzucato, Mariana. (2016). From market fixing to market-creating: A new framework for innovation policy. Industry and Innovation, 23 (2): 140-156. org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1146124
  23. Mazzucato, Mariana. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policies: Challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27 (5): 803-815. org/10.1093/icc/dty034
  24. Mazzucato, Mariana, & Penna, Caetano. (2016). The Brazilian innovation system: A mission-oriented policy proposal. Brasília, DF: Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos (CGEE). https://www.cgee.org.br/the-brazilian-innovation-system (Retrieved June 3, 2022).
  25. (2011). Public research institutions: Mapping sector trends. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  26. Owyong, David T. (2000). Measuring the trickle-down effect: A case study on singapore. Applied Economics Letters, 7 (8): 535-539. org/10.1080/13504850050033337
  27. Papadopoulos, Yannis. (1995). Analysis of functions and dysfunctions of direct democracy: Top-down and bottom-up perspectives. Politics & Society, 23 (4): 421-448. org/10.1177/0032329295023004002
  28. Pedersen, David Budtz. (2014). The political epistemology of science-based policy-making. Society, 51 (5): 547-551. org/10.1007/s12115-014-9820-z
  29. Polt, Wolfgang, et al. (2019, 2019). Matching type of mission and governance in mission-oriented R&I policy. Paper presented at the Eu-SPRI 2019 Conference: Science, Technology, and Innovation Policies for Sustainable Development, Rome.
  30. Rayner, Steve. (2010). How to eat an elephant: A bottom-up approach to climate policy. Climate Policy, 10 (6): 615-621. org/10.3763/cpol.2010.0138
  31. Robinson, Douglas K. R., & Mazzucato, Mariana. (2019). The evolution of mission-oriented policies: Exploring changing market creating policies in the US and European space sector. Research Policy, 48 (4): 936-948. org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.005
  32. Wanzenböck, Iris, et al. (2020). A framework for mission-oriented innovation policy: Alternative pathways through the problem–solution space. Science and Public Policy, 47 (4): 474-489. org/10.1093/scipol/scaa027
  33. Weber, K. Matthias, & Rohracher, Harald. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41 (6): 1037-1047. org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015
  34. Weinberg, Alvin M. (1967). Reflections on big science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  35. Wittmann, Florian, et al. (2021). Governing varieties of mission-oriented innovation policies: A new typology. Science and Public Policy, 48 (5): 727-738. org/10.1093/scipol/scab044

 

 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics