A Philosophical Analysis of the Nature, Position, and Role of Models in Conventional Economics and Islamic Economics Based on the Foundations of Islamic Philosophers

Document Type : علمی - پژوهشی

Author

PhD, Department of Economic Jurisprudence, Research Center of the Higher Institute of Jurisprudence and Islamic Sciences, Qom, Iran.

10.30471/mssh.2025.10442.2573

Abstract

Introduction and Objectives: One of the fundamental issues in the philosophy of science and economic science is the analysis of the role of models in economic theorization. In economics, models are conceptual and mathematical tools used to simplify, explain, and predict economic phenomena. Despite their importance, there are divergent perspectives on models. Some view modeling as an extension of the mathematization of economics and criticize it, while others employ modeling in economic analyses without examining its theoretical foundations. Therefore, a philosophical analysis of modeling in Islamic economics is essential. The foundations of Islamic philosophers, due to their theoretical rigor and compatibility with Islamic economics, can play a key role in explaining the position of models. This paper seeks to provide a theoretical framework for Islamic economics by examining the nature, position, and role of models. To this end, it first explores models in the philosophy of science and economics, then analyzes their place in Islamic economics based on the principles of Islamic philosophers. The novelty of this research lies in its examination of the theoretical status of models in Islamic economics based on Islamic philosophical foundations and its proposal of a structured modeling approach.
Methodology: This study employs a library-based data collection method and combines historical and rational analytical approaches. The historical method is used to examine the status of modeling in conventional economics, reviewing existing practices and various theories on the nature and function of models. In contrast, the rational method is applied to analyze the position of models in Islamic economics. This approach, grounded in the principles of Islamic philosophers, seeks to provide a coherent explanation of modeling consistent with Islamic economics. Key concepts such as iʿtibāriyyāt (conventional constructs) and ṣūrat-i ʿilmī (scientific form) are drawn from Islamic philosophy and applied to economic modeling. Additionally, the functions of models in Islamic economics are categorized into explanatory, prescriptive, and policy models, and a logical framework for their use is developed. Finally, the proposed framework is applied to the Justice-Barakah Model to assess its practical applicability.
Results: The findings indicate that models in Islamic economics can be explained through concepts from Islamic philosophy, such as iʿtibāriyyāt and ṣūrat-i ʿilmī. Unlike conventional views that see models merely as abstract tools for simplification, Islamic philosophical frameworks treat models as epistemic constructs—either singular or composite mental representations—intended to depict reality or bring about external change. Ontologically, they are a form of "claimed mental existence" designed by scholars to better understand theories, concepts, and their interrelations. Thus, models possess both epistemological and ontological dimensions, blending truth and conventionality, with the dominance of one aspect determining their type. Accordingly, models are theoretical, reductive, and declarative tools that assist Islamic economic theorists in conceptualization.
Islamic economic models are classified into three categories:
1. Explanatory models, which depict existing economic realities and focus on understanding current conditions.
2. Prescriptive models, which outline ideal objectives and relationships based on Islamic principles, offering templates for an ideal society.
3. Policy models, which propose strategies to achieve prescriptive goals, with success measured by their effectiveness in meeting those objectives.
A critical insight is the use of iʿtibāriyyāt (conventional constructs) and simplification at all stages. A key contribution of this research is the redefinition of models in Islamic economics based on Islamic philosophical theory and the development of a structured modeling process. The study also demonstrates that the use of scientific models in Islamic economics is feasible, provided certain principles and limitations—such as maintaining the distinction between real and conventional aspects and preserving the model's intended purpose—are observed. Models can thus serve as tools for understanding, explanation, prescription, and policymaking in economic issues.
Discussion and Conclusion: The analysis of models in economic science reveals their central role in explaining, analyzing, and predicting economic issues. In conventional economics, models are categorized into three main types:
1. Theoretical-conceptual and mathematical models, used to formulate or finalize a theory.
2. Econometric models, employed for empirical testing of theories.
3. Policy models, which combine the first two types and are used to analyze policy impacts.
In contrast, Islamic economics redefines models using philosophical concepts such as ṣūrat-i ʿilmī and iʿtibāriyyāt. This study shows that models in Islamic economics serve as tools for explanation, prescription, and policymaking and can be designed to align with Islamic principles. A key finding is the distinction between real representation and conventional representation in models, where Islamic economic models function as declarative and reductive theoretical tools to simplify understanding and visualize economic realities. Furthermore, the logical stages of modeling in Islamic economics—from foundational concept recognition to comprehensive policy formulation—are delineated. This framework can assist researchers and policymakers in designing practical and effective models to address economic challenges based on Islamic principles. Finally, the proposed stages are applied to the Justice-Barakah Model to demonstrate their feasibility and practical utility in Islamic economics.

Keywords


  1. اسوندن، برایان و هوارد آر وین. (1392). اقتصاد کلان جدید. ترجمه منصور خلیلی عراقی و علی سوری. تهران: سمت.
  2. بولاند، لارنس. (1385). «نگرش‌‌های معاصر در اقتصاد پوزیتیویستی». ترجمه مصعب عبداللهی. مجله اقتصادی، 6(59 و60): 72-83.
  3. پورفرج، علیرضا. (1387). «طراحی مدل علمی براساس مبانی و پارادایم‌های اقتصاد اسلامی». فصلنامه اقتصاد اسلامی، 8(32): 123-140.
  4. توکلی، محمدجواد. (1398). مبانی فلسفی و روش‌شناسی اقتصاد. قم: پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه.
  5. داو، شیلا سی. (1388). کنکاشی در روش‌شناسی علم اقتصاد. تهران: جهاد دانشگاهی، ص164-171.
  6. صدرالدین شیرازی، محمد بن ابراهیم. (1981). الحکمۀ المتعالیه فی الاسفار العقلیه الاربعه. بیروت: داراحیاء التراث.
  7. طباطبایی، سیدمحمدحسین. (1385). اصول فسلفه و روش رئالیسم. قم: انتشارات صدرا.
  8. طباطبایی، سیدمحمدحسین. (1404). نهایۀالحکمه. قم: جامعه مدرسین.
  9. غنی‌نژاد، موسی. (1376). مقدمه‌ای بر معرفت‌شناسی علم اقتصاد. تهران: موسسه عالی پژوهش در برنامه‌ریزی و توسعه.

 

References

  1. Barro, R. J. (2018). Macroeconomics: A modern approach (M. N. Esfahani & E. Rasoulinejad, Trans). Noor-e Elm. (Original work published 1997)
  2. Boland, L. A. (2000). The methodology of economic model building. Routledge.
  3. Boland, L. A. (2006). Contemporary approaches in positive economics (M. Abdollahi, Trans.). *Majalleh-ye Eqtesadi, 59-60*, 72-83.

http://ejip.ir/article-1-348-fa.html

  1. Boumans, M. (2005). How economists model the world into numbers. Routledge.
  2. Boumans, M. (2005). Models in economics. In J. B. Davis, A. Marciano, & J. Runde (Eds.), The Elgar companion to economics and philosophy (pp. 260-282). Edward Elgar.
  3. Dehkhodā, A. A. (2020). Loghatnāmeh-ye Dehkhodā [Dehkhoda Dictionary] (Digital ed.). University of Tehran. (Original work published 1998)

https://dehkhoda.ut.ac.ir

  1. Dow, S. C. (2009). An inquiry into economic methodology (M. Motavasseli & A. Rostamian, Trans.). Jahad Daneshgahi. (Original work published 2002)
  2. Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2006). Scientific models. In S. Sarkar & J. Pfeifer (Eds.), The philosophy of science: An encyclopedia (pp. 740-749). Routledge.
  3. Ghanīnejād, M. (1997). Moqaddameh-ī bar maʿrefat-shenāsī-ye ʿelm-e eqtesād [An introduction to the epistemology of economics]. Institute for Advanced Studies in Planning and Development.
  4. Lawson, T. (2003). Reorienting economics. Routledge.
  5. Mankiw, N. G. (2013). Macroeconomics (8th ed.). Worth Publishers.
  6. McCloskey, D. N. (2008). The rhetoric of economics. In D. M. Hausman (Ed.), The philosophy of economics: An anthology (3rd ed., pp. 320-336). Cambridge University Press.
  7. McGraw-Hill. (2005). Model theory. In McGraw-Hill concise encyclopedia of science and technology (5th ed., pp. 1234-1235). McGraw-Hill.
  8. Mollā Ṣadrā [Ṣadr al-Dīn Shīrāzī]. (1981). Al-Ḥikmat al-mutaʿāliya fī al-asfār al-ʿaqliyya al-arbaʿa [The transcendent philosophy of the four intellectual journeys] (Vols. 1-9). Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī. (Original work published 17th century)
  9. Morgan, M. S., & Knuuttila, T. (2012). Models and modelling in economics. In U. Mäki (Ed.), Philosophy of economics (pp. 49-87). Elsevier.
  10. Psillos, S. (2007). Philosophy of science A-Z. Edinburgh University Press.
  11. Pūrfaraj, A. (2008). Tarahī-ye model-e ʿelmī bar asās-e mabānī va parādāym-hā-ye eqtesād-e eslāmī [Designing scientific models based on foundations and paradigms of Islamic economics]. Journal of Islamic Economics, 8(32), 123-152.
  12. Reiss, J. (2013). Philosophy of economics: A contemporary introduction. Routledge.
  13. Rosenberg, A. (2005). Philosophy of science: A contemporary introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  14. Samuelson, P. A. (1983). Foundations of economic analysis. Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1947)
  15. Snowdon, B., & Vane, H. R. (2013). Modern macroeconomics: Its origins, development and current state (M. K. Iraqi & A. Suri, Trans.). SAMT. (Original work published 2005)
  16. Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). Economics of the public sector (3rd ed.). W.W. Norton.
  17. Sugden, R. (2008). Credible worlds: The status of theoretical models in economics. In D. M. Hausman (Ed.), The philosophy of economics: An anthology (3rd ed., pp. 337-360). Cambridge University Press.
  18. Ṭabāṭabāʾī, S. M. H. (2006). Osūl-e falsafeh va ravesh-e reʾālism [The principles of philosophy and the method of realism] (Vols. 1-5). Sadrā Publications. (Original work published 1953)
  19. Ṭabāṭabāʾī, S. M. H. (2023). Nihāyat al-ḥikma [The ultimate wisdom]. Jāmeʿeh-ye Modarresīn-e Ḥawzeh-ye ʿElmīyyeh. (Original work published 1975)
  20. Tavakolī, M. J. (2019). Mabānī-ye falsafī va ravesh-shenāsī-ye eqtesād [Philosophical foundations and methodology of economics]. Research Institute of Ḥawzah and University, Qom.
  21. Waterman, A. M. C. (2003). Mathematical modeling as an exegetical tool: Rational reconstruction. In W. J. Samuels, J. E. Biddle, & J. B. Davis (Eds.), A companion to the history of economic thought (pp. 178-192). Blackwell.