Wittgenstein's philosophizing methodology

Although extracting the opinions of a thinker and analyzing and evaluating them is of great importance, this always faces one of the most important methodological challenges: what is the relationship between the understanding and perception of the analyst of the text and with what method and model did he reach such an inference? This article seeks to present a method to solve such a challenge; a "text-oriented" model that can, while avoiding common detailing, put the various components of a philosophical school or idea together and then bring them together in a specific systematization. It is noteworthy that philosophizing is not possible on the one hand without a foundation of methodological studies, and on the other hand without understanding its psychological roots; that is, to recognize the components of a philosophical school or idea and, in addition, to organize a new structure for philosophizing, we need both of these things simultaneously. The attempt to understand and analyze any philosophical school or idea depends on understanding the psychological roots of how to philosophize and any methodological studies surrounding it. Therefore, if we want to organize a research structure for the way to philosophize and even criticize a philosophical school or idea, Wittgenstein's perspective is considered in this article based on one of his works to introduce a way to analyze and criticize it accurately. This four-stage model begins with the problematic analysis of the text and progresses to the problematic synthesis of propositions, and then proceeds to methodological analysis and inference of achievements, especially regarding the text of humanities problems in society.