بنی اسدی، احمد و سعید ضرغامی (1394)، «واکاوی انتقادی رابطه استاد- دانشجو در فرایند پایان‌نامه نویسی از منظر دانشجو: (رشته فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت)»، اندیشه‌های نوین تربیتی، (۲)۱۱، ص۱۲۵-۱۴۸.
خرمشاهی، بهاءالدین (1376)، سیر بی‌سلوک، تهران: ناهید.
فاضلی، نعمت‌الله (1394)، «تشویش نوشتن: مسئله‌مندی نوشتن در حوزه علوم انسانی و اجتماعی در ایران»، پژوهش در نگارش کتب دانشگاهی، دوره 19، ش37، ص1-24.
_________ (زیر چاپ)، «صورت‌بندی مسئلة سواد دانشگاهی در ایران: نظریه‌ای نو در زمینة نوشتار و نثر دانشگاهی در ایران»، فصلنامه پژوهش در نگارش کتب دانشگاهی.
محمدی، امیر (۱۳۹۳)، بررسی عوامل اجتماعی مؤثر بر میزان تولید و مصرف نوشتار در بین دانشجویان، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه خوارزمی.
موسی‌پور، نعمت‌الله؛ مهشید مهرانی و بهمن زندی (1388)، «بررسی مهارت‌های نوشتاری در بین دانشجویان نظام آموزش حضوری و از راه دور مورد مطالعه دانشگاه پیام نور و دانشگاه شهید باهنرکرمان»، فصلنامه انجمن آموزش عالی ایران، س2، ش1، ص ۱37-۱69.
Aitchison, C., (2010), "Learning together to publish: Writing group pedagogies for doctoral publishing", In Publishing pedagogies for the doctorate and beyond, Routledge, pp. 95–112.
Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., Mullis, I. V. S., Latham, A. S., & Gentile, C. A., (1994), NEAP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) 1992: Writing report card. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED370119
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L., (2005), "Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework", International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 19–32.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Bandara, W., Furtmueller, E., Beekhuyzen, J., Gorbacheva, E., & Miskon, S., (2015), "Achieving Rigour in Literature Reviews: Insights from Qualitative Data Analysis and Tool-Support", Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34(8), 154–204.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V., (2006), "Using thematic analysis in psychology", Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Caffarella, R. S., & Barnett, B. G., (2000), "Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques", Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 39–52.
Catterall, J., Ross, P., Aitchison, C., & Bergin, S., (2011), "Pedagogical Approaches that Facilitate Writing in Postgraduate Research Candidature in Science and Technology", Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 8(2), Article 7. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ944948.pdf.
Cole, M., & Engeström, Y., (1997), A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. Distributed Cognitions : Psychological and Educational Considerations, 1–46. Retrieved from https://oca.korea.ac.kr/link.n2s?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat00008a&AN=kor.000045252317&lang=ko&site=eds-live&scope=site
Cotterall, S., (2011), "Doctoral students writing: where’s the pedagogy?", Teaching in Higher Education, 16(4), 413–425.
Duff, P. A., (2007), "Problematising academic discourse socialisation", Learning Discourses and the Discourses of Learning, 1(1), 1–18.
Engestrom, Y., (2010), "Expansive Learning at Work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization", Review of Educational Research, 14(1), 133–156.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
Engeström, Y., (2007), "Putting Vygotsky to work: The change laboratory as an application of double stimulation", The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky, 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521831040.015
Engeström, Y., (2009), Th"e future of activity theory", Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory, 303–328.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809989.020
Engeström, Y., (2011), "From design experiments to formative interventions", Theory & Psychology, Vol. 21, https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311419252
Engeström, Y., (2014), Learning by expanding, Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki-Gitai, R.-L., (1999), "Perspectives on Activity Theory. Academy of Management Review, Vol.24, https://doi.org/10.2307/259146.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A., (2010), "Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges", Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002
Engeström, Y., Virkkunen, J., Helle, M., Pihlaja, J., & Poikela, R., (1996), "The Change Laboratory as a Tool for Transforming Work", Lifelong Learning in Europe, 1(2), 10–17.
Grant, M. J., Booth, A., & Centre, S., (2009), "A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies", Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Hammann, L., (2005), "Self-regulation in academic writing tasks", International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 15–26.
Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Irwin, B., Parkin, H. J., & Thorpe, L., (2011), "Using technology to encourage student engagement with feedback: A literature review", ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 19(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/21567069.2011.586677
Higgins, J., (2011), Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1. 0. The Cochrane Collaboration. Confidence Intervals.
Hopwood, N., (2010), "Doctoral experience and learning from a sociocultural perspective", Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 829–843.
Jaskiewicz, W., & Tulenko, K., (2012), "Increasing community health worker productivity and effectiveness: A review of the influence of the work environment", Human Resources for Health, 10(September 2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-10-38.
Kamler, B., & Thomson, P., (2008), "The failure of dissertation advice books: Toward alternative pedagogies for doctoral writing", Educational Researcher, 37(8), 507–514.
Kamler, B., & Thomson, P., (2014), Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision. Routledge.
Kiley, M., (2009), "Identifying threshold concepts and proposing strategies to support doctoral candidates", Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 293–304.
Knowles, S., (1999), "Feedback on writing in postgraduate supervision: Echoes in response–context, continuity and resonance", Supervision of Postgraduate Research in Education, 113–128.
Lea*, M. R., (2004), "Academic literacies: A pedagogy for course design", Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 739–756.
Lea, M., & Street, B., (1998), "Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach", Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364
Lee, A., & Kamler, B., (2008), "Bringing pedagogy to doctoral publishing", Teaching in Higher Education, 13(5), 511–523.
Leont’ev, A. N., (1978), "Activity and Consciousness 4.1", Revista OFFLINE, (4), 1–22.
Leontjev, A. N., (1981), Problems of the development of the mind, Moscow, Russia: Progress.
Li, J., (2016), "The interactions between emotion, cognition, and action in the activity of assessing undergraduates’ written work", In Activity Theory in Education (pp. 107–119), Springer.
Lillis, T., (2003), "Student writing as’ academic literacies’: Drawing on Bakhtin to move from critique to design", Language and Education, 17(3), 192–207.
Martelo, M. L., (2011), "Use of Bibliographic Systems and Concept Maps: Innovative Tools to Complete a Literature Review", Research in the Schools, 18(1), 62–70.
Mays, N., Roberts, E., & Popay, J., (2001), "Synthesising research evidence", Studying the Organisation and Delivery of Health Services: Research Methods, 220.
Murray, R., (2013), Writing for academic journals. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C., (2015), "The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review", Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N. L., & Collins, K. M. T., (2012), "Qualitative analysis techniques for the review of the literature", The Qualitative Report, 17(28), 1–28.
Pham, M. T., Rajić, A., Greig, J. D., Sargeant, J. M., Papadopoulos, A., & Mcewen, S. A., (2014), "A scoping review of scoping reviews: Advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency", Research Synthesis Methods, 5(4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1123.
Poverjuc, O., (2010), A longitudinal case study of students’ perceptions of academic writing and of themselves as academic writers: the writing experiences of five students who spoke English as an additional language, PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
Russell, D. R., (1998), "The limits of the apprenticeship models in WAC/WID research", In Conference on College Composition and Communication, Retrieved from http://www. public. iastate. edu/~ drrussel/russell4c98. html.
Simpson, S., & Matsuda, P. K., (2008), "Mentoring as a long-term relationship: Situated learning in a doctoral program", Learning the Literacy Practices of Graduate School: Insiders’ Reflections on Academic Enculturation, 90–104.
Spencer, L., & Ritchie, J., (2002), "Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research", In Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 187–208). Routledge.
Sword, H., (2009), "Writing higher education differently: A manifesto on style", Studies in Higher Education, 34(3), 319–336.
Thein, A. H., & Beach, R., (2010), "Mentoring doctoral students towards publication within scholarly communities of practice", Publishing Pedagogies for the Doctorate and Beyond, 117–136.
Thompson, I., (2013), "The Mediation of Learning in the Zone of Proximal Development through a Co-constructed Writing Activity", Source: Research in the Teaching of English, 47(3), 247–276. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24397856%5Cnhttp://about.jstor.org/terms
Vygotsky, L. S., (1978), Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S., (1997), The instrumental method in psychology. In The collected works of LS Vygotsky. Vol. 3, Problems of the theory and history of psychology: including the chapter on the crisis in psychology, Plenum P.
Wegener, C., & Tanggaard, L., (2013), "Supervisor and student co-writing: An apprenticeship perspective", In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research (Vol. 14).
Wenger, E., (2010), "Communities of practice and social learning systems: the career of a concept", Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice, 3, 179–198.
Wisker, G., (2015), "Developing doctoral authors: Engaging with theoretical perspectives through the literature review", Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(1), 64–74.
Wisker, G., & Savin-Baden, M., (2009), "Priceless conceptual thresholds: beyond the’stuck place’in writing", London Review of Education, 7(3), 235–247.
)