1. چالمرز، آلن (1999)، علم و تولید آن، ترجمه مصطفی تقوی (1394)، قم: پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه.
2. سایر، اندرو (1992)، روش در علوم اجتماعی رویکردی رئالیستی، ترجمه عماد افروغ (1393)، تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
3. Ayer, A. J. (1959), Logical positivism, Simon and Schuster.
4. Baghramian, M. (2008, Relativism about science. In Martin Curd, Stathis Psillos (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, Routledge (Taylor & Francis).
5. Baert, P. (2005), Philosophy of the social sciences: Towards pragmatism, Polity.
6. Benton, T., & Craib, I. (2010), Philosophy of social science: The philosophical foundations of social thought. Macmillan International Higher Education.
7. Bhaskar, R. (1979), The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. Routledge.
8. Bhaskar, R. (2008), A Realist Theory of Science. Routledge.
9. Bhaskar, R. (2009), Scientific realism and human emancipation, Routledge.
10. Bhaskar, R. (2010), Reclaiming reality: A critical introduction to contemporary philosophy, Taylor & Francis.
11. Chalmers, A. F. (2013), What is this thing called science?, Hackett Publishing.
12. Fasce, A. (2017), “What do we mean when we speak of pseudoscience? The development of a demarcation criterion based on the analysis of twenty-one previous attempts”, Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin, 6(7), 459-488.
13. Feyerabend, P. (1987), Against method: outline of an anarchist theory of knowledge. London. NLB.
14. Feyerabend, P. K. (1999), Knowledge, science and relativism (Vol. 3), Cambridge University Press.
15. Kuhn, T. S. (1970), The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.), University of Chicago Press.
16. Lakatos, I. (1978), The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Ed by John Worrall and Gregory Currie, Cambridge University Press.
17. Newton-Smith, W. H. (1986), The Rationality of Science, London: Routledge.
18. Popper, K. (1959), The logic of scientific discovery, Hutchinson.
19. Popper, K. (1963), Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge, routledge.
20. Popper, K. R. (1972), Objective knowledge (Vol. 360), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Popper, K. (1979), Three worlds, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
22. Popper, K. (1994), The myth of the framework: In defence of science and rationality, London: Routledge.
23. Prelević, D. (2019), “Kuhn’s Incommensurability Thesis: Good Examples Still to Be Found”, Filozofia Nauki, 27(4 (108)), 61-77.
24. Seidel, M. (2013), “Why the epistemic relativist cannot use the sceptic’s strategy, A comment on Sankey”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 44(1), 134-139.
25. Sankey, H. (2012), “Scepticism, relativism and the argument from the criterion”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 43(1), 182-190.
26. Tambolo, L. (2015), “A tale of three theories: Feyerabend and Popper on progress and the aim of science”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 51, 33-41.
)