منابع
داناییفرد، حسن، الوانی، مهدی، و آذر، عادل (1383). روش‌شناسی پژوهش کمّی در مدیریت: رویکردی جامع. تهران: صفار، اشراقی.
شیرویهپور، شهریار، و فضلی، صفر (1401). از پیشنگری تا آیندهنگاری: ابتنای روش‌شناسی آیندهپژوهی بر مدل پیاز پژوهش. روش شناسی علوم انسانی، 28(113)، 31-50.
طیبی ابوالحسنی، سیدامیرحسین (1398). درآمدی بر روش تحقیق: رویههای استاندارد تحلیل داده‌های کیفی. سیاست نامه علم و فناوری، 09(2) ، 67-69.
گودرزوند چگینی، مهرداد، و یوسفی، ثمین (1402). واکاوی مدل پیاز پژوهش و کاربست آن در پژوهش علوم اجتماعی. نخستین همایش ملی روش‌های پژوهش در علوم انسانی و اجتماعی: رویکردهای نوپدید و چالشهای پیش رو، تهران.
محمدپور، احمد (1402). ضدروش: زمینههای فلسفی و رویههای عملی در روش‌شناسی کیفی. تهران: نشر لوگوس.
References
Alharahsheh, H. H., & A. Pius (2020). A review of key paradigms: Positivism VS interpretivism. Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 39-43. https://doi.org/10.36348/gajhss.2020.v02i03.001.
Arksey, H., & O’malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International journal of social research methodology, 8(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Asterby-Smith, M., R. Thorpe, & P. R. Jackson (2012). Management research. SAGE Publications. from https://uk.sagepub.com
Babbie, E (2022). The practice of social research (15th ed.). Cengage Learning. from https://www.amazon.com/s?k=9780357360767&i=stripbooks&linkCode=qs
Basias, N., & Y. Pollalis. (2018). Quantitative and qualitative research in business and technology: Justifying a suitable research methodology. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 7, 91-105. from https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3363016
Bell, E., A. Bryman, & B. Harley ( 2019). Business research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press. from https://global.oup.com/academic/product/business-research-methods-9780198869443
Bergin, T. (2018). An introduction to data analysis: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods, pp. 365-440. from https://www.amazon.com/s?k=9780198869443
Blaikie, N., & Priest, J. (2019). Designing social research: The logic of anticipation. John Wiley & Sons. from https://www.wiley.com/en-jp/Designing Social Research:The Logic of Anticipation,3rd Edition-p-9781509517411
Bronfenbrenner, U (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press. from https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674224575
Bryman, A (2020). Social research methods (6th ed.). Oxford University Press. from https://global.oup.com/academic/product/social-research-methods-9780199689453
Cohen, L., L. Manion, & K. Morrison (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020322434
Cooper, H (2024). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. from https://www.amazon.com/Research-Synthesis-Meta-Analysis-Step-Step/dp/1483331156
Creswell, J. W (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. from https://www.amazon.com/Research-Design-Qualitative-Quantitative-Approaches/dp/1506386710
Creswell, J. W., & C. N. Poth (2023). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. from https://www.amazon.com/Research-Design-Qualitative-Quantitative-Approaches/dp/1506386711
Creswell, J. W., & J. D. Creswell (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. SAGE Publications. from https://www.amazon.com/Research-Design-Qualitative-Quantitative-Approaches/dp/1506386709
Creswell, J. W., & J. D. Creswell (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. from https://www.amazon.com/Research-Design-Qualitative-Quantitative-Approaches/dp/1506386712
Creswell, J. W., & V. L. P. Clark (2021). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. from https://www.amazon.com/Research-Design-Qualitative-Quantitative-Approaches/dp/1506386711
Crotty, M (2020). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. SAGE Publications. from https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5019222
Danayifar, H. , Alvani, M. & Azar, A. (2004). Quantitative Research Methodology in Management: A Comprehensive Approach.Tehran:Saffar-Eshraghi [ln persian] . from https://eshraghipub.com
Denzin, N. K., & Y. S. Lincoln (2017). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. from https://www.amazon.com/SAGE-Handbook-Qualitative-Research-Handbooks/dp/1412974178
Field, A. 2023. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. from https://uk.sagepub.com
Fletcher, A. J (2017). Applying critical realism in qualitative research: methodology meets method. International journal of social research methodology, 20(2), 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1144401
Flick, U (2023). Introduction to qualitative research (7th ed.). SAGE Publications. from https://uk.sagepub.com
Gall, M. D., J. P. Gall, & W. R. Borg (2023). Educational research: An introduction (9th ed.). https://doi.org/1010.2307/3121583
Gamage, A. N. (2025). Research Design, Philosophy, and Quantitative Approaches in Scientific Research Methodology. Sch J Eng Tech, 2, 91-103. https://doi.org/10.36347/sjet.2025.v13i02.004
Godin, B. (2003). Measuring science: Is there “basic research” without statistics. Social science information, 42(1), 57-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030420017
Goodarzvand Chegini, M., & Yousefi, S. (2023). Analysis of the Onion Model of Research and Its Application in Social Science Research. The National Conference on Research Methods in the Humanities and Social Sciences: Emerging Approaches and Future Challenges, Tehran,(1-18). [ln persian] from https://civilica.com/doc/2024893
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research, 2(163-194), 105. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2017.51005
Hayashi, P., G. Abib, & N. Hoppen (2019). Validity in qualitative research: A processual approach. The Qualitative Report, 24(1), 98-112. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3443
Herr, K., & G. L. Anderson (2014). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. from https://uk.sagepub.com
Holden, M. T., & P. Lynch (2004). Choosing the appropriate methodology: Understanding research philosophy. The Marketing Review, 4(4), 397-409. https://doi.org/10.1362/1469347042772428
Israel, M (2014). Research ethics and integrity for social scientists: Beyond regulatory compliance (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. from https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5019247
Johnson, B., & R. Gray (2010). A history of philosophical and theoretical issues for mixed methods research. Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 2, 69-94. from https://uk.sagepub.com
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2024). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. SAGE publications, (7th ed.), pp. 179-206. from https://uk.sagepub.com
Jones, M. (2007). Using software to analyses qualitative data ,429,1-24. from http://ro.uow.edu.au/commpapers/429
Kairuz, T., Crump, K., & O’Brien, A. (2007). Tools for data collection and analysis. Pharmaceutical Journal, 278. from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Keith-Crump/publication/43499524_Perspectives_on_qualitative_research_Part_2_Useful_tools_for_data_collection_and_analysis
Kaushik, V., & C. A. Walsh (2019). Pragmatism as a research paradigm and its implications for social work research. Social Sciences, 8(9), 255. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8090255
Khalil, H., Jia, R., Moraes, E. B., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., Peters, M., ... & Evans, C. (2025). Scoping reviews and their role in identifying research priorities. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 111712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111712
Khan, S. N (2014). Qualitative research method: Grounded theory. International journal of business and management, 9(11), 224-233. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v9n11p224
Kivunja, C., & A. B. Kuyini (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 26-41. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26
Liang, T. P., & Y. Liu (2018). Research landscape of business intelligence and big data analytics: A bibliometrics study. Expert Systems with Applications, 111, 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.05.018
Malalgoda, C., Amaratunga, D., & Haigh, R. (2018). Empowering local governments in making cities resilient to disasters: research methodological perspectives. Procedia engineering, 212, 902-909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.116
Maxwell, J. A (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. from https://uk.sagepub.com
Melnikovas, A (2018). Towards an explicit research methodology: Adapting research onion model for futures studies. Journal of Futures Studies, 23(2), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.201812_23(2).0003
Miles, M. B., & A. M. Huberman (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. from https://uk.sagepub.com
Mohammadpour, A. (2023). Counter-Method: The Philosophical underpinnings and practical Procedures of qualitative methodology. Tehran: Logos,64-65. [ln persian] from https://irlogos.com
Morgan, D. L (2014). Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: A pragmatic approach. SAGE Publications. from https://uk.sagepub.com
Omodan, B. I. (2025). A Model for Selecting Theoretical Framework through Epistemology of Research Paradigms. African Journal of Inte, 4(1), 275-285. https://doi.org/10.51415/ajims.v4i1.1022
Pallant, J (2022). SPSS survival manual (8th ed.). Open University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452
Pathirage, C. P., R. D. G. Amaratunga, and R. P. Haigh (2008). The role of philosophical context in the development of research methodology and theory. The Built and Human Environment Review, 1(1), 1-10. from http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/22646/
Phair, D. & K. Warren (2021). Saunders’ Research Onion: Explained Simply. [Online]. 2021. Available from https://gradcoach.com/saunders-research-onion. [Accessed: 7 September 2022].
Ragab, M. A., & A. Arisha (2018). Research methodology in business: A starter’s guide. https://doi.org/10.5430/mos.v5n1p1
Ryan, A. B (2018). Post-positivist approaches to research. Researching and Writing your Thesis: A Guide for Postgraduate Students, 12-26. from https://mural.maynoothuniversity.ie/id/eprint/874
Sahay, A (2016). Peeling Saunder’s research onion. Research Gate, Art, 3(2), 1-5.from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309488459_Peeling_Saunder%27s_Research_Onion
Saunders, M., & Bristow, A. (2023). Research Methods for Business Students Preface (9th edition) (pp.i-xxvii, Pearson,128-174) from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367780349_2023_Research_Methods_for_Business_Students_Preface_and_Chapter_4
Saunders, M., P. Lewis, & A. Thornhill (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson ,128-175.from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240218229_Research_Methods_for_Business_Students
Scotland, J. (2012). Exploring the philosophical underpinnings of research: Relating ontology and epistemology to the methodology and methods of the scientific, interpretive, and critical research paradigms. English language teaching, 5(9), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n9p9
Shah, S. R., & A. Al-Bargi (2013). Research paradigms: Researchers’ worldviews, theoretical frameworks and study designs. Arab World English Journal, 4(4), 252-264. from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260158808_Research_Paradigms_Researchers’_Worldviews_Theoretical_Frameworks_and_Study_Designs
Shirooyehpour, Sh. & Fazli, S. (2022). from Forecasting to Foresight: basing the Methodology of Futures Studies on Research Onion Model. Methodology of the Humanities, 28(113), 31–50. [ln persian] https://doi.org/10.30471/mssh.2022.8534.2319
Singh, S. (2019). Purpose and process of research. In Methodological issues in management research: Advances, challenges, and the way ahead (pp. 27-36). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-973-220191003
Smith, L. T (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Zed Books. from https://a.co/d/c5CLY49
Sook, L. C., & T. N. Heng (2020). A refined research onion model for accounting information systems implementation. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(5), 287-292. from https://thesai.org/Publications/ViewIssue?volume=11&issue=5&code=IJACSA
Tashakkori, A. (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. SAGE Publications. from https://www.amazon.com/Handbook-Methods-Social-Behavioral-Research/dp/1412972663
Tayebi Abolhasani, S. A. (2019). An introduction to research methodology: Standard procedures for qualitative data analysis. Policy Letter of Science and Technology, 9(2), 67–69. [ln persian] from https://stpl.ristip.sharif.ir/article_21535.html
Thanh, N. C., & T. T. Thanh (2015). The interconnection between interpretivist paradigm and qualitative methods in education. American Journal of Educational Science, 1(2), 24-27. from http://www.aiscience.org/journal/allissues/ajes.html?issueId=70380102
Zolfagharian, M., B. Walrave, R. Raven, & A. G. L. Romme (2019). Studying transitions: Past, present, and future. Research Policy, 48(9), 103788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.012
Žukauskas, P., J. Veinhardt, & R. Andriukaitienė (2018). Philosophy and paradigm of scientific research. Management culture and corporate social responsibility, 121(13), 506-518. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.70628
)