منابع
داناییفرد، حسن (1395). روششناسی مطالعات دلالتپژوهی در علوم اجتماعی و انسانی: بنیانها، تعاریف، اهمیت، رویکردها و مراحل اجرا. روششناسی علوم انسانی، 22(86)، 39-71
داناییفرد، حسن (1401). روششناسی مطالعات دلالتپژوهی (چاپ اول). قم: پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه.
رضایی، ایمان، قاسمی، حاکم، عیوضی، محمدرحیم، فتح طاهری، علی و درویشی، فرهاد (1402). تبیین امکان رشته بودن آیندهپژوهی بهعنوان یک حوزۀ فرارشتهای. آیندهپژوهی ایران، 8(1)، 29-54.
سیاح مفضلی، اردشیر، و اسدی، علیرضا (1394). بررسی ساختارهای فکری و مفاهیم کلیدی در آیندهپژوهی و ارائه چهارچوب اجرای مطالعات آیندهپژوهی. آیندهپژوهی مدیریت، 102(1)، 15-26.
شیرویهپور، شهریار، و فضلی، صفر (1401). از پیشنگری تا آیندهنگاری: ابتنای روششناسی آیندهپژوهی بر مدل پیاز پژوهش. روششناسی علوم انسانی، 28(113)، 31-50.
فضلی، صفر، و نیکنام، علی (1403). توسعه یک سامانه پشتیبانی تصمیم فازی مبتنی بر سناریو. تصمیمگیری و تحقیق در عملیات، 9(3)، 690-707.
محمدپور، احمد (1397). ضدروش: زمینههای فلسفی و رویههای عملی در روششناسی کیفی. تهران: لوگوس.
مرادی، ابوذر (1403). رویکرد پدیدارگرایانه کوانتومی؛ چیستی واقعیت در علوم اجتماعی. روششناسی علوم انسانی، 30(119)، 73-93.
References
Aaltonen, M. (2009). Evaluation and organization of Furturea Research Methodology–V 3.0. In Futures research methodology (3 ed.). Springer.
Aligica, P. D. (2003). Prediction, explanation and the epistemology of future studies. Futures, 35, 1027-1040. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00067-3
Amara, R., & Lipinski, A. J. (1974). The futures field : functions, forms, and critical issues. Institute for the Future. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/001632877490072X
Bell, W. (2003). Foundations of Futures Studies: Volume 1: History, Purposes, and Knowledge (Human Science for a New Era Series). Transaction Publishers. https://www.routledge.com/Foundations-of-Futures-Studies-Volume-1-History-Purposes-and-Knowledge/Bell/p/book/9780765805393?srsltid=AfmBOoo6qrZymzfXVFZJH8Ew3YbQyvP9x9oPifZgDvlSfeDe7vH180kc
Bonet, I., Peña, A., Lochmuller, C., Patiño, H. A., Chiclana, F., & Góngora, M. (2021). Applying fuzzy scenarios for the measurement of operational risk. Applied Soft Computing, 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107785
Bradfield, R., Wright, G., Burt, G., Cairns, G., & Van Der Heijden, K. (2005). The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning. Futures, 37(8), 795-812. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.01.003
Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). Cambridge dictionary. In https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/implication#dataset_cacd
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2020). THEMATIC ANALYSIS: A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/thematic-analysis/book248481
Danaeefard, H. (2016). Methodology of Implication Research Studies in Social and Human Sciences: Foundations, Definitions, Importance, Approaches, and Implementation Stages. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities Journal, 22(86), 39-71. [In Persian]
Danaeefard, H. (2022). Methodology of Implication Research Studies (1 ed.). Research Institute of Hawzeh and University. [In Persian]
Fazli, S., & Niknam, A. (2024). Development of a scenario-based fuzzy robust decision support system. Journal of decisions and operations research, 9(3), 690-707. https://doi.org/10.22105/dmor.2024.476625.1869 [In Persian]
Glenn, J. C., & Gordon, T. J. (2004). Futures Research Methodology.
Golghamat Raad, N., & Rajendran, S. (2024). A hybrid scenario-based fuzzy stochastic model for closed-loop dry port network design with multiple robustness measures. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103417.
Gordon, T. J. (1992). the methods of futures research. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 522(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716292522001003
Hideg, É. (2015). PARADIGMS IN FUTURES FIELD. Economic Geography and Futures Studies Department Corvinus University of Budapest. https://unipub.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/1900/1/HidegEva_2015a.pdf.
Horton, A. (1999). A simple guide to successful foresight. Foresight, 1(1), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636689910802052
Inayatullah, S. (2007). Questioning the future : methods and tools for organization and societal transformation (Third edition. ed.). Tamkang University Press. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/library/ucl-only/questioning-the-future-sohail-inayatullah.pdf.
Karlsen, J. E., & Karlsen, H. (2013). Classification of Tools and Approaches Applicable in Foresight Studies. In M. Giaoutzi & B. Sapio (Eds.), Recent Developments in Foresight Methodologies (pp. 27-52). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5215-7_3
Kasperski, G., Zielinski, A., & Romain, P. (2021). Robust optimization with scenarios using random fuzzy sets IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9494494.
Masini, E. (1993). Why Futures Studies? Grey Seal. https://books.google.com/books?id=GBhmAAAAMAAJ
Miles, I., & Keenan, M. (2003). Practical Guide to Regional Foresight in the UK.
Mofazali, A. S., & Asadi, A. (2015). Examining intellectual structures and key concepts in futures studies and providing a framework for implementing futures studies. Journal of Future Studies Management, 102(1), 15-26. http://sanad.iau.ir/fa/Article/Download/786329 [In Persian]
Mohammadpour, A. (2018). Counter-Method: The Pjilosophical Understandings and Practical Procedures of Qualitative Methodology. Logos. [In Persian]
Moradi, A. (2024). Quantum Phenomenological Approach: the Nature of Reality in Social Sciences. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 30(119), 73-93. https://doi.org/10.30471/mssh.2024.10202.2549 [In Persian]
Nguene M, G. N., & Finger. (2007). A fuzzy-based approach for strategic choices in electric energy supply: The case of a Swiss power provider on the eve of electricity market opening. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 20, 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2006.03.005
Paliokaite, A., Pacesa, N., & Sarpong, D. (2014). Conceptualizing Strategic Foresight: An Integrated Framework [Article]. Conceptualizing Strategic Foresight, 23(3-4), 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.1968
Pishvaee, M. S., Fathi, M., & Jolai, F. (2008). A fuzzy clustering-based method for scenario analysis in strategic planning. South African Journal of Business Management, 39(3), 21-31. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/218401/1/sajbm-v39i3-0564.pdf
Poli, R. (2018). A note on the classification of futurerelated methods. European Journal of Futures Research, 6(15). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-018-0145-9
Popper, R. (2008). Foresight methodology. In The Handbook of Technology Foresight. Concepts and Practice. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Ramaswamy Govindan, A., & Li, X. (2023). Fuzzy logic-based decision support system for automating ergonomics risk assessments. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2023.103459.
Rezaei, I., Ghasemi, H., Eivazi, M. R., Taheri, A. F., & Darvishi, F. (2023). Explanation of Disciplinary Possibility of Futures Studies as a Transdisciplinary Field. Iran Futures Studies, 8(1), 29-54. https://doi.org/10.30479/jfs.2023.18121.1446 [In Persian]
Roeber, B., Sosa, E., Steup, M., & Turri, J. (2024). Contemporary debates in epistemology (Third edition. ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Seginer, R. (2009). Future Orientation: A Conceptual Framework. In R. Seginer (Ed.), Future Orientation: Developmental and Ecological Perspectives (pp. 1-27). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88641-1_1.
Shirooyehpour, S., & Fazli, S. (2022). from Forecasting to Foresight: basing the Methodology of Futures Studies on Research Onion Model. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 28(113), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.30471/mssh.2022.8534.2319 [In Persian]
Singh, S., Raj, R., Dhar, A., Khot, N., & Powar, S. (2024). A novel hybrid grey-fuzzy optimization model for assessment of solar technologies considering different scenarios of the Indian market. Energy Reports, 11, 2023-2034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.01.059
Sorourkhah, A., & Edalatpanah, S. A. (2021). Considering the Criteria interdependency in the Matrix Approach to Robustness Analysis with Applying Fuzzy ANP. Fuzzy Optimization and Modeling Journal, 2(2), 22-33. https://doi.org/10.30495/fomj.2021.1932066.1029
Steup, M., & Sosa, E. (2005). Contemporary debates in epistemology. In Contemporary debates in philosophy 3 Blackwell Pub. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781405137423
Tuckett, A. G. (2005). Applying thematic analysis theory to practice: a researcher’s experience. Contemporary nurse : a journal for the Australian nursing profession, 19(1-2), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.19.1-2.75
Vaismoradi Turunen, H. B. T. M. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive. Nurs Health Sci, 15(3), 398-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
Voros, J. (2003). A generic foresight process framework. Foresight, 5(3), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680310698379
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
)