الستی، کیوان (2023) تحلیل تاریخی نیم سده تلاش باری ساماندهی پژوهش در ایران، روش شناسی علوم انسانی، 29(117) 97-118
الستی، کیوان (2022). مطالعه نقش دستورالعمل‌های مقابله با سوءرفتارهای علمی در سلامت علمی. سیاست علم و فناوری، 14(4)، 17-32.
الستی کیوان. (2022). علم پساعادی و عقلانیت فعالیت علمی: بررسی تحول نقش ارزش ها در «عصر پساعادی».
صفرپور، اسحاق، عباسپور، و سلیمی. (2022). کاوش تجربیات و دیدگاه‌های اعضای هیئت علمی حوزه علوم انسانی و هنر دانشگاه شیراز در مورد آیین‌نامه ارتقا. نشریه مطالعات دانشپژوهی، 1(1)، 29-54.
موسوی، آرش، و الستی، کیوان. (2019). چارچوبی برای تحلیل نظام مند اخلاق سیاستگذاری علم و فناوری.
References
Alasti, K. (2022a). “A Study on Legal Rules of Procedure for Dealing with Scientific Misconducts.” Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 14(4), 17-32. https://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_13915.html?lang=en [In Persian]
Alasti, K. (2022b). “Post Normal Science and Rationality of Scientific Work: The Study of the Role of Values in Science.” Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 28(110), 33-52. https://doi.org/10.30471/mssh.2021.7752.2222 [In Persian]
Alasti, K. (2023). “A Historical Analysis of Half a Century of Efforts to Organize Research in Iran.” Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 29(117), 97-118. https://doi.org/10.30471/mssh.2024.9832.2511 [In Persian]
Bohannon, J. (2014). “Study of Massive Preprint Archive Hints at the Geography of Plagiarism.” Science Insider, Dec 11, 2014. https://www.science.org/content/article/study-massive-preprint-archive-hints-geography-plagiarism
Braun, D., & Guston, D. H. (2003). “Principal-Agent Theory and Research Policy: An Introduction.” Science and Public Policy, 30(5), 302-308. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154303781780290
Brown, J. R. (2008). “The Community of Science.” In M. Carrier, D. Howard, & J. A. Kourany (Eds.), The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice: Science and Values Revisited (pp. 189-216). University of Pittsburgh Press.
Brown, M. J. (2019). “Is Science Really Value Free and Objective? From Objectivity to Scientific Integrity.” In K. C. Elliott & T. Richards (Eds.), What Is Scientific Knowledge? (pp. 226-241). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203703809-15
Callaway, E. (2016). “Publisher Pulls 58 Articles by Iranian Scientists over Authorship Manipulation.” Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.20916
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Scott, P., Schwartzman, S., & Nowotny, H. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. SAGE Publications.
Guston, D. H. (1996). “Principal-Agent Theory and the Structure of Science Policy.” Science and Public Policy, 23(4), 229-240. https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/23.4.229
Guston, D. H. (2000). Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. Cambridge University Press.
Kretser, A., Murphy, D., Bertuzzi, S., Abraham, T., Allison, D. B., Boor, K. J., ... & Yada, R. (2019). “Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium.” Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(2), 327-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00094-3
Lal, K. K., & Sharma, B. (2023). “Research Integrity & Ethics: Scientific Misconduct.” In National Seminar on Academic Integrity and Research Ethics. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373719345
Merton, R. K. (1938). “Science and the Social Order.” Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321-337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513
Merton, R. K. (1942). “The Normative Structure of Science.” In The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (pp. 267-278). https://www.panarchy.org/merton/science.html
Moussavi, A., & Alasti, K. (2019). “A Framework for Systematic Analysis of Ethical Issues in S&T Policy.” Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 12(2), 29-41. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20080840.1398.12.2.3.8 [In Persian]
Polanyi, M. (1945). “The Autonomy of Science.” The Scientific Monthly, 60(2), 141-150. http://www.jstor.org/stable/18601
Politi, V. (2024). “The Value-Free Ideal, the Autonomy Thesis, and Cognitive Diversity.” Synthese, 204(1), 24. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-024-04673-1
Resnik, D. B. (2005). The Ethics of Science: An Introduction. Routledge.
Resnik, D. B. (2006). The Price of Truth: How Money Affects the Norms of Science. Oxford University Press.
Resnik, D. B. (2010). “Financial Interests and the Norms of Academic Science.” In The Commodification of Academic Research: Science and the Modern University (pp. 65-89).
Rip, A. (2010). “Protected Spaces of Science: Their Emergence and Further Evolution in a Changing World.” In Science in the Context of Application (pp. 197-220). Springer Netherlands.
Rip, A. (2018). Futures of Science and Technology in Society (pp. 49-74). Springer VS.
Safarpour, I., Abbaspour, J., & Salimi, G. (2022). “Exploring the Experiences and Views of Art and Humanities Faculty Members on Promotion Regulation.” Journal of Knowledge-Research Studies, 1(1), 29-54. https://jkrs.tabrizu.ac.ir/jufile?ar_sfile=351193 [In Persian]
Shahghasemi, E., & Akhavan, M. (2015). “Confessions of Academic Ghost Authors: The Iranian Experience.” Sage Open, 5(1), 2158244015572262. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244015572262
Stone, R. (2016). “A Shady Market in Scientific Papers Mars Iran’s Rise in Science.” Science, 9(453), 46. https://www.science.org/content/article/shady-market-scientific-papers-mars-iran-s-rise-science
Sztompka, P. (2007). “Trust in Science: Robert K. Merton’s Inspirations.” Journal of Classical Sociology, 7(2), 211-220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X07078038
Taylor, P. L. (2009). “Scientific Self-Regulation—So Good, How Can It Fail? Commentary on ‘The Problems with Forbidding Science’.” Science and Engineering Ethics, 15(3), 395-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9123-8
)