مرور روایی واقع‌گرایی انتقادی در پژوهش‌های سیستم اطلاعات

1. Archer, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T., & Norrie, A. (Eds.). (1998). Critical Realism: Essential Readings (1st ed.).

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315008592

2. Backhouse, R. E. (1994). New directions in economic methodology. Routledge.
3. Benbasat, I., & Weber, R. (1996). Research commentary: Rethinking “diversity” in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 7(4), 389-
4. Benz, C. R., Ridenour, C. S., & Newman, I. (2008). Mixed methods research: Exploring the interactive continuum. SIU Press.
5. Bhaskar, R. (1978). A Realist Theory of Science (Vol. null).
6. Bhaskar, R. (1979). The possibility of naturalism: a philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences / by Roy Bhaskar. Harvester Press.
7. Bhaskar, R. (1989). Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy (Vol. 55). Verso.
8. Bhaskar, R. (2013a). The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. Routledge.
9. Bhaskar, R. (2013b). A realist theory of science. Routledge.
10. Blaikie, N., & Priest, J. (2017). Social research: Paradigms in action. John Wiley & Sons.
11. Bygstad, B., Munkvold, B. E., & Volkoff, O. (2016). Identifying generative mechanisms through affordances: a framework for critical realist data analysis. Journal of Information Technology, 31, 83-
12. Carlsson, S. (2003). Advancing information systems evaluation (research): a critical realist approach. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 6(2), 11-
13. Creswell, J. W. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research / John W. Creswell, Vicki L. Plano Clark. SAGE Publications.
14. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
15. Danermark, B., Ekström, M., & Karlsson, J. C. (2019). Explaining society: Critical realism in the social sciences. Routledge.
16. Dobson, P. J. (2001). The philosophy of critical realism—an opportunity for information systems research. Information systems frontiers, 3(2), 199-
17. Downward, P., & Mearman, A. (2002). Critical realism and econometrics: constructive dialogue with Post Keynesian economics. Metroeconomica, 53(4), 391-
18. Downward, P., & Mearman, A. (2007). Retroduction as mixed-methods triangulation in economic research: reorienting economics into social science. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31(1), 77-
19. Dwivedi, Y. K., Wastell, D., Laumer, S., Henriksen, H. Z., Myers, M. D., Bunker, D., Elbanna, A., Ravishankar, M., & Srivastava, S. C. (2015). Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions. Information Systems Frontiers, 17, 143-
20. Fleetwood, S. (1998). Situating critical realism in economics. In Critical realism in economics (pp. 141-150). Routledge.
21. Fox, S. (2009). Applying critical realism to information and communication technologies: a case study. Construction management and economics, 27(5), 465-
22. Imran, H. (2024). Pragmatic critical realism and Mixed methods in Inter-disciplinary Research—Management and Information systems. Valley International Journal Digital Library, 5953-
23. Johnston, R., & Smith, S. P. (2010). How critical realism clarifies validity issues in theory-testing research: analysis and case. Information systems foundations: The role of design science, 21-
24. Landry, M., & Banville, C. (1992). A disciplined methodological pluralism for MIS research. Accounting, management and information technologies, 2(2), 77-
25. Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and reality. Routledge.
26. Lee, A. S. (1999). Rigor and relevance in MIS research: Beyond the approach of positivism alone. MIS quarterly, 29-
27. Lee, A. S., & Baskerville, R. L. (2003). Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 14(3), 221-
28. Lee, A. S., & Hubona, G. S. (2009). A scientific basis for rigor in information systems research. MIS quarterly, 237-
29. Markus, M. L., Steinfield, C. W., & Wigand, R. T. (2006). Industry-wide information systems standardization as collective action: the case of the US residential mortgage industry. MIS quarterly, 439-
30. Maxwell, J. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard educational review, 62(3), 279-
31. McEvoy, P., & Richards, D. (2006). A critical realist rationale for using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. Journal of research in nursing, 11(1), 66-
32. Mingers, J. (2000). The contribution of critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for OR/MS and systems. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51(11), 1256-
33. Mingers, J. (2001). Combining IS research methods: towards a pluralist methodology. Information Systems Research, 12(3), 240-
34. Mingers, J. (2003). The paucity of multimethod research: a review of the information systems literature. Information systems journal, 13(3), 233-
35. Mingers, J. (2004). Real-izing information systems: critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems. Information and Organization, 14(2), 87-
36. Mingers, J. (2006). A critique of statistical modelling in management science from a critical realist perspective: its role within multimethodology. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(2), 202-

https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601980

37. Mingers, J., Mutch, A., & Willcocks, L. (2013). Critical Realism: Basic Concepts. Mis Quarterly, 37(3), 795-
38. Mingers, J., & Standing, C. (2017). Why things happen–Developing the critical realist view of causal mechanisms. Information and Organization, 27(3), 171-
39. Modell, S. (2009). In defence of triangulation: a critical realist approach to mixed methods research in management accounting. Management Accounting Research, 20(3), 208-
40. Morton, P. (2006). Using critical realism to explain strategic information systems planning. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA), 8(1), 3.
41. Myers, M. D., & Avison, D. (2002). Qualitative research in information systems: a reader. Sage.
42. Outhwaite, W. (1976a). [A Realist Theory of Science, Roy Bhaskar]. Social Studies of Science, 6(1), 123-

http://www.jstor.org/stable/284790

43. Outhwaite, W. (1976b). Reviews: Roy Bhaskar, A Realist Theory of Science (Leeds: Leeds Books, 1975), 260 pp.,£ 5.95 hardback,£ 2.25 paperback. ISBN. 085952 0137 (cloth) 085952 0145 (paperback). Social Studies of Science, 6(1), 123-
44. Robey, D. (1996). Research commentary: diversity in information systems research: threat, promise, and responsibility. Information Systems Research, 7(4), 400-
45. Runde, J. (1998). Assessing causal economic explanations. Oxford Economic Papers, 50(2), 151-
46. Runde, J., & de Rond, M. (2010). Evaluating causal explanations of specific events. Organization Studies, 31(4), 431-
47. Sayer, A. (1999). Realism and social science. Sage.
48. Sayer, R. A. (1992). Method in social science: A realist approach. Psychology Press.
49. Shotter, J. (1990). Roy Bhaskar, Reclaiming Reality: a Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy, London: Verso, 1989, £24.95, paper £8.95, ix + 218 pp. History of the Human Sciences, 3(3), 443-

https://doi.org/10.1177/095269519000300309

50. Spagnoletti, P., Ceci, F., & Bygstad, B. (2022). Online black-markets: An investigation of a digital infrastructure in the dark. Information Systems Frontiers, 1-
51. Strong, D. M., & Volkoff, O. (2010). Understanding Organization—Enterprise system fit: A path to theorizing the information technology artifact. MIS quarterly, 731-
52. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. SAGE publications.
53. Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C., & Teddlie, C. B. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches (Vol. 46). sage.
54. Tsoukas, H. (1989). The validity of idiographic research explanations. Academy of management review, 14(4), 551-
55. Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., & Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS quarterly, 21-
56. Volkoff, O., Strong, D. M., & Elmes, M. B. (2007). Technological embeddedness and organizational change. Organization Science, 18(5), 832-
57. Vukojević, B. (2016). Creswell JW: Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, London: Sage publications, 2009. Politeia, 6(12), 191-
58. Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 74-
59. Wheaton, J., & Kreps, D. (2023). Towards a critical realist approach to the dark side of digital transformation. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 5, 1252458.
60. Williams, C. K., & Karahanna, E. (2013). Causal explanation in the coordinating process: A critical realist case study of federated IT governance structures. Mis Quarterly, 933-
61. Wisker, G. (2007). The postgraduate research handbook: Succeed with your MA, MPhil, EdD and PhD. Macmillan International Higher Education.
62. Wynn Jr, D., & Williams, C. K. (2012). Principles for conducting critical realist case study research in information systems. MIS quarterly, 787-
63. Zachariadis, M., Scott, S., & Barrett, M. (2013). Methodological implications of critical realism for mixed-methods research. Mis Quarterly, 855-