تحلیل تطبیقی کیفی و خط‌مشی عمومی

احمدی, هانیه; دانایی فرد, حسن; امامی, سیدمجتبی; دلخواه, جلیل

doi:10.30471/mssh.2020.5890.1938

تحلیل تطبیقی کیفی و خط‌مشی عمومی

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

¹ گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

² استاد، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس

³ مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه امام صادق (ره)، تهران، ایران

⁴ مرکز مطالعات و توسعه فناوری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

10.30471/mssh.2020.5890.1938

چکیده

روش تحلیل تطبیقی کیفی نخستین بار توسط رگین معرفی و در حوزه‌های مختلف علوم اجتماعی به کار گرفته شده است. روش یادشده از حیث رویکرد از آن جهت اهمیت دارد که از دو رویکرد کمّی و کیفی، دو ویژگی متغیرمحوری و اُفته ‌محوری را به عاریت گرفته است. در این مقاله، ابتدا روش یادشده مرور و گونه‌های مختلف آن بررسی شده است؛ سپس با بررسی پژوهش‌های حوزه خط‌مشی‌ که با روش یادشده اجرا شده‌اند، پژوهش‌های حاضر در قالب حوزه‌های خط‌مشی‌گذاری یعنی حوزه‌های مطالعاتی خط‌مشی و سیاست، فرایند خط‌مشی، تحلیل و ارزشیابی خط‌مشی، نهادهای خط‌مشی‌گذاری و اجرای خط‌مشی تقسیم‌بندی شدند.

درواقع، هدف این مقاله، معرفی روشی در حوزه علت‌یابی به اندیشمندان خط‌مشی و خط‌مشی‌گذاران است تا بتوانند در کنار روش‌های مرسوم آماری برای غنی‌سازی پژوهش خود از آن بهره گیرند. بدین منظور و برای فهم بهتر روش، کاربست‌های آن در حوزه خط‌مشی نیز ذکر شده است؛ امّا به یقین می‌توان با تدقیق بیشتر در این روش به موارد کاربرد بیشتری از آن پی برد.

تازه های تحقیق

1. ساعی، علی؛ افشار کبیری؛ محمدسالار کسرایی و حسین صادقی (1390)، «سرمایه اجتماعی و حکمرانی خوب: تحلیل تطبیقی فازی بین کشوری از سال 2000 تا 2008»، مسائل اجتماعی ایران (دانشگاه خوارزمی)، 2 (2)، ص63−94.

2. عباسی تقی دیزج، رسول (1398)، «تحلیل تطبیقی−کیفی عوامل مؤثر بر تولید علم در سطح کلان»، جامعه‌شناسی کاربردی (مجله پژوهشی علوم انسانی دانشگاه اصفهان)، 1(73)، ص105−122.

3. عباسی تقی دیزج، رسول و مسعود فراستخواه (1393)، «تحلیل فازی عوامل مؤثر بر توازن بین برابری آموزش عالی و توسعه اقتصادی در سطح کلان (یک رویکرد تطبیقی−کمی)»، پژوهش‌های جامعه‌شناسی معاصر، 3(5)، ص25−50.

4. عباسی، رسول و رضا همتی (1392). «تحلیل تطبیقی−کیفی تضاد سیاسی خشونت آمیز در سطح کلان»، فصلنامه جامعه‌شناسی کاربردی، 24(2)، ص 89−110.

5. Bandelow, N. C., Vogeler, C. S., Hornung, J., Kuhlmann, J., & Heidrich, S. (2019), “Learning as a Necessary but Not Sufficient Condition for Major Health Policy Change: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis Combining ACF and MSF”, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 21(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1393920

6. Basurto, X., & Speer, J. (2010), “Structuring the Calibration of Qualitative Data as Sets for Qualitative Comparative Analysis ( QCA ) ”, https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1831606

7. Berg-Schlosser, D., & De Meur, G. (2009), “Comparative research design: case and variable selection. In Beno Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.)”, Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (pp. 19–32). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569

8. Berg-Schlosser, D., De Meur, G., Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. C. (2009), “Qualitative comparative analysis (qca) as an approach. In Benoît Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.)”, Applied Social Research Methods: Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (pp. 1–18). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569 NV - 51

9. Capano, G., Pritoni, A., & Vicentini, G. (n.d.), “Do policy instruments matter? Governments’ choice of policy mix and higher education performance in Western Europe”, Journal of Public Policy, 1–27. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X19000047

10. Caren, N., & Panofsky, A. (2005), “A Technique for Adding Temporality to Qualitative”, Sociological Methods & Research, 34(2), 147–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124105277197

11. Cooper, B., & Glaesser, J. (2016), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis , Necessary Conditions , and Limited Diversity : Some Problematic Consequences of Schneider and Wagemann ’ s Enhanced Standard Analysis”, Field Methods, 28(3), 300–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X15598974

12. Cragun, D., Pal, T., Vadaparampil, S. T., Baldwin, J., Hampel, H., & DeBate, R. D. (2016), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A Hybrid Method for Identifying Factors Associated with Program Effectiveness”, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(3), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815572023

13. Cronqvist, L., & Berg-Schlosser, D. (2009), “Multi-value qca (mvqca). In Benoît Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.)”, Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (pp. 69–86). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569 NV - 51

14. Davis, A., Javernick-Will, A., & Cook, S. M. (2019), “The use of qualitative comparative analysis to identify pathways to successful and failed sanitation systems”, Science of The Total Environment, 663, 507–517. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.291

15. De Block, D., & Vis, B. (2018), “Addressing the Challenges Related to Transforming Qualitative Into Quantitative Data in Qualitative Comparative Analysis”, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1558689818770061. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818770061

16. De Meur, G., Rihoux, B., & Yamasaki, S. (2009). “Addressing the critiques of qca. In Benoît Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (pp. 147–166). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569 NV - 51

17. Dekker, R., & Scholten, P. (2017), “Framing the Immigration Policy Agenda: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Media Effects on Dutch Immigration Policies”, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216688323

18. Fischer, M., & Maggetti, M. (2017), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis and the Study of Policy Processes”, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 19(4), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2016.1149281

19. Hill, L. G., Cooper, B. R., & Parker, L. A. (2019), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A Mixed-Method Tool for Complex Implementation Questions”, The Journal of Primary Prevention, 40(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-019-00536-5

20. Hörisch, F. (2013), “Fiscal Policy in Hard Times: A Fuzzy-Set QCA of Fiscal Policy Reactions to the Financial Crisis”, Zeitschrift Für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 7(2), 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-013-0152-y

21. Ingrams, A. (2017), “The transparency performance puzzle : A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of policy failure in open government initiatives un co rre ct ed pr oo f v si un co rre ct pr oo”, Information Polity, (22), 25–39, https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-160014

22. Jordan, E., Gross, M. E., Javernick-Will, A. N., & Garvin, M. J. (2011), “Use and misuse of qualitative comparative analysis”, Construction Management and Economics, 29(11), 1159–1173, https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.640339

23. Kahwati, L., Jacobs, S., Kane, H., Lewis, M., Viswanathan, M., & Golin, C. E. (2016). “Using qualitative comparative analysis in a systematic review of a complex intervention”, Systematic Reviews, 5, 82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0256-y

24. Kane, H., Lewis, M. A., Williams, P. A., & Kahwati, L. C. (2014), “Using qualitative comparative analysis to understand and quantify translation and implementation”, Translational Behavioral Medicine, 4(2), 201–208, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-014-0251-6

25. Kim, Y., & Verweij, S. (2016), “Two effective causal paths that explain the adoption of US state environmental justice policy”, Policy Sciences, 49(4), 505–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9249-x

26. Kingdon, J. W. (1984), Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, Boston: Little Brown.

27. Krook, M. L. (2010), “Women’s Representation in Parliament: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis”, Political Studies, 58(5), 886–908, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00833.x

28. Lee, S. S. (2013a), “Fuzzy-set method in comparative social policy: a critical introduction and review of the applications of the fuzzy-set method”, Quality & Quantity, 47(4), 1905–1922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9633-8

29. Lee, S. S. (2013b), “High non-standard employment rates in the Republic of Korea and Japan: Analyzing policy configurations with fuzzy-set/QCA”, Policy and Society, 32(4), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.10.005

30. Legewie, N. (2013), “An Introduction to Applied Data Analysis with Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) ”, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14(3), Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1961/3594

31. Maggetti, M. (2009), “The role of independent regulatory agencies in policy-making: a comparative analysis”, Journal of European Public Policy, 16(3), 450–470, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802662854

32. Maggetti, M., & Levi-Faur, D. (2013), “Dealing with Errors in QCA”, Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 198–204. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23563603

33. Marx, A. (2010), “Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA) and model specification: Benchmarks for future csQCA applications”, International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(2), 138–158, https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2010.4.2.138

34. Mello, P. A. (2013), “From Prospect to Practice : A Critical Review of Applications in Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis”, In 8th Pan-European Conference on International Relations. Warsaw, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2349513

35. Mill, J. S. (Ed.). (2011), “Of the Four Methods of Experimental Inquiry”, In A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence, and the Methods of Scientific Investigation (Vol. 1, pp. 450–479), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139149839.024

36. Pogrebinschi, T., & Ryan, M. (2018), “Moving beyond input legitimacy: When do democratic innovations affect policy making? ”, European Journal of Political Research, 57(1), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12219

37. Primc, K., Slabe-Erker, R., & Majcen, B. (2019), “Constructing energy poverty profiles for an effective energy policy”, Energy Policy, 128, 727–734. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.059

38. Pritoni, A. (2018), “Public Agendas and Policy Agendas in Three Western European Countries: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis”, Government and Opposition, 1–22. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/gov.2018.28

39. Ragin, C. C. (1987), “The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies”, University of California Press, Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pnx57

40. Ragin, C. C. (1994), “Introduction to qualitative comparative analysis”, In A. M. Hicks & T. Janoski (Eds.), The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State (pp. 299–319). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139174053.013

41. Ragin, C. C. (2008a), “Measurement Versus Calibration: A Set‐Theoretic Approach”, In J. M. Box-Steffensmeier, H. E. Brady, D. Collier, & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology (pp. 174–198). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.003.0008

42. Ragin, C. C. (2008b), Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

43. Ragin, C. C. (2009), “Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsqca) ”, In Benoît Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (pp. 87–122). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569 NV - 51

44. Ragin, C. C., & Rubinson, C. (2009), “The distinctiveness of comparative research”, In T. L. & N. Robinson (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Comparative Politics (pp. 12–34). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857021083.n2

45. Ragin, C. C., & Sonnett, J. (2005), “Between Complexity and Parsimony: Limited Diversity, Counterfactual Cases, and Comparative Analysis BT - Vergleichen in der Politikwissenschaft”, In S. Kropp & M. Minkenberg (Eds.) (pp. 180–197). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80441-9_9

46. Ragin, C. C., Patros, T., Strand, S. I., & Rubinson, C. (2017). USER’S GUIDE TO Fuzzy-Set / Qualitative Comparative Analysis. California, Irvine.

47. Rihoux, Benoît, & De Meur, G. (2009), “Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csqca) ”, In Benoît Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (pp. 33–68). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569 NV - 51

48. Rihoux, Benoît, & Grimm, H. (2006), “Introduction. In Benoît Rihoux & H. Grimm (Eds.), Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis Beyond the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28829-5

49. Rihoux, Benoît, Álamos-Concha, P., Bol, D., Marx, A., & Rezsöhazy, I. (2013), “From Niche to Mainstream Method? A Comprehensive Mapping of QCA Applications”, in Journal Articles from 1984 to 2011. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 175–184. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23563600

50. Rihoux, Benoît, Rezsöhazy, I., & Bol, D. (2011), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) in Public Policy Analysis: an Extensive Review”, German Policy Studies, 7(3), 9–82.

51. Rihoux, Benoît. (2008), “Case‐Oriented Configura‐Tional Research: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (Qca), Fuzzy Sets, and Related Techniques”, In J. M. Box-Steffensmeier, H. E. Brady, D. Collier, & B. Rihoux (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology (pp. 722–736). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.003.0031

52. Roig-Tierno, N., Gonzalez-Cruz, T. F., & Llopis-Martinez, J. (2017), “An overview of qualitative comparative analysis: A bibliometric analysis”, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.12.002

53. Sabatier, P. A. (1988), “An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein”, Policy Sciences, 21(2/3), 129–168. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4532139

54. Schneider, C. Q. (2019), “Two-step QCA revisited: the necessity of context conditions”, Quality & Quantity, 53(3), 1109–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0805-7

55. Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2006), “Reducing complexity in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Remote and proximate factors and the consolidation of democracy”, European Journal of Political Research, 45(5), 751–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00635.x

56. Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2010), “Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets”, Comparative Sociology, 9(3), 397–418. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729793

57. Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012), “Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Strategies for Social Inquiry”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139004244

58. Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2013), “Doing Justice to Logical Remainders in QCA: Moving Beyond the Standard Analysis”, Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 211–220. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23563605

59. Sehring, J., & Korhonen, K. (2013), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis ( QCA ): An application to compare national Qualitative Comparative Analysis ( QCA ) An application to compare national REDD + policy processes (No. Working Paper 121) ”, Indonesia, Bogor. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/004278

60. Smith, K. B., & Larimer, C. (2017), The Public Policy Theory Primer, New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494352

61. Stokke, O. S. (2004),. “Boolean Analysis, Mechanisms, and the Study of Regime Effectiveness BT - Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies”, In A. Underdal & O. R. Young (Eds.) (pp. 87–119). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2208-1_5

62. Thomann, E. (2019), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis ( QCA ) as a tool for street-level bureaucracy. In P. Hupe (Ed.)”, Research Handbook on Street-Level Bureaucracy (pp. 370–391). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786437631.00035

63. Thomas, J., O’Mara-Eves, A., & Brunton, G. (2014), “Using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in systematic reviews of complex interventions: a worked example”, Systematic Reviews, 3, 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-67

64. Tóth, Z., Henneberg, S. C., & Naudé, P. (2017), “Addressing the ‘Qualitative’ in fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis: The Generic Membership Evaluation Template”, Industrial Marketing Management, 63, 192–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.10.008

65. True, J. L., Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2007), “Punctuated equilibrium theory: Explaining stability and change in American policymaking”, In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.

66. Verweij, S., Klijn, E.-H., Edelenbos, J., & Buuren, A. van. (2013), “What makes governance networks work? A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of 14 Dutch spatial planning projects”, Public Administration, 91(4), 1035–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12007

67. Vink, M. P., & Van Vliet, O. (2009), “Not Quite Crisp, Not Yet Fuzzy? Assessing the Potentials and Pitfalls of Multi-value QCA”, Field Methods, 21(3), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X09332633

68. Vinke-de Kruijf, J., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Knieper, C. (2018), “Wider learning outcomes of European climate change adaptation projects: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis”, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.09.004

69. Wagemann, C., & Schneider, C. Q. (2010), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis ( QCA ) and Fuzzy-Sets : Agenda for a Research Approach”, Comparative Sociology, 9, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729838

70. Warren, J., Wistow, J., & Bambra, C. (2013), “Applying Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to evaluate a public health policy initiative in the North East of England”, Policy and Society, 32(4), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.10.002

71. Williams, M., & Vogt, W. (2011), “The SAGE Handbook of Innovation in Social Research Methods”, London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268261

72. Yin, R. K. (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed.), Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Inc.

73. Yong, T., & Park, C. (2017), “A qualitative comparative analysis on factors affecting the deployment of electric vehicles”, Energy Procedia, 128, 497–503. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.066